Is this bullish or bearish?
My take is bearish. Looking for a fall towards the marked zone.
#Crude https://t.co/NFRjJSMN2P
Is this bullish or bearish? My take is bearish \U0001f61c#BSE pic.twitter.com/2xY3Ag7cNJ
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) February 18, 2022
More from Aakash Gangwar
#KPITTECH https://t.co/qPLH3li2Yy
Charts for reference. During a downtrend, news based buying is an opportunity to make an exit in most of the cases. #KPITTECH #Hikal https://t.co/63WBMFZ6BT pic.twitter.com/OgWzulTXiD
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) April 27, 2022
#CNXIT https://t.co/w3qedea7T6
Almost there. Quick move. It can spend time over here before the next leg of fall. Let's see.#NIFTYIT https://t.co/GOB28HRvMp pic.twitter.com/6sNc7j8gEU
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 9, 2022
#CNXIT
Almost there. Be prepared to see 33k again in Nifty IT. Only for swing trades, no investment here. #CNXIT https://t.co/RMAsQweoFY pic.twitter.com/BmKD7g6Q8i
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) May 25, 2022
1. Long term channel top.
2. Curvature shift of 20 and 50 WMA along with price hitting 20 WMA frequently.
3. Overall weakness in IT sector.
4. For reference, study reliance top in August 2020, study Nasdaq Weekly chart and the top made in Nov 2021.
#tataelxi https://t.co/RmJa5LrdAP
I have traded the current fav Tata Elxi from 2200 to 4500. No regret on missing out rest of the move because I am not an investor. Now there are many technical red flags. I might be trolled but 10.5k looks max target while 5k or 3-4 years of sideways looks inevitable.#tataelxi
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 26, 2022
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
He's STILL in charge of the Mueller investigation.
He's STILL refusing to hand over the McCabe memos.
He's STILL holding up the declassification of the #SpyGate documents & their release to the public.
I love a good cover story.......
The guy had a face-to-face with El Grande Trumpo himself on Air Force One just 2 days ago. Inside just about the most secure SCIF in the world.
And Trump came out of AF1 and gave ol' Rod a big thumbs up!
And so we're right back to 'that dirty rat Rosenstein!' 2 days later.
At this point it's clear some members of Congress are either in on this and helping the cover story or they haven't got a clue and are out in the cold.
Note the conflicting stories about 'Rosenstein cancelled meeting with Congress on Oct 11!"
First, rumors surfaced of a scheduled meeting on Oct. 11 between Rosenstein & members of Congress, and Rosenstein just cancelled it.
Rep. Andy Biggs and Rep. Matt Gaetz say DAG Rod Rosenstein cancelled an Oct. 11 appearance before the judiciary and oversight committees. They are now calling for a subpoena. pic.twitter.com/TknVHKjXtd
— Ivan Pentchoukov \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@IvanPentchoukov) October 10, 2018