Is this bullish or bearish?
My take is bearish. Looking for a fall towards the marked zone.
#Crude https://t.co/NFRjJSMN2P

Is this bullish or bearish? My take is bearish \U0001f61c#BSE pic.twitter.com/2xY3Ag7cNJ
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) February 18, 2022
More from Aakash Gangwar
#CNXIT https://t.co/bJeKTMoCji

The current formation might look like a falling wedge, but the way moving averages are placed, it looks like a falling wedge which can lead to a parabolic downmove for the marked target. #CNXIT pic.twitter.com/GmXOI3HmUN
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) May 10, 2022
#Nifty50 https://t.co/ajpEwosu3v

JK bhai let's have fake breakout in Nifty \U0001f61c
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) March 10, 2022
Not joking though, have a reason to anticipate that. https://t.co/idzSRIpWga pic.twitter.com/MNsTm3Mron
#CNXIT
Watching the marked zone to be tested. If it doesn't cross it, then most probably a parabolic downmove towards 24k. That would lead to even large caps cracking just like Small and Midcaps. #CNXIT https://t.co/FxbzP5vlBr pic.twitter.com/FSqcSqTQM9
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 21, 2022
You May Also Like
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.