Hi incelmute
https://t.co/NoWz3gaBb2
Awesome holocaust denial joke you got there, incelmute.

https://t.co/gT9TCpmbiC
I'm starting to think incelmute may have an antisemitism problem.
Somebody tell frosty
More holocaust jokes from incelmute.
https://t.co/4Thv1djAyQ
Oh. This explains it.
Incelmute rofl
Wouldn't be appropriate but he does it anyway.
https://t.co/ObU46qEl60
This doesn't sound very woke to me at all.
https://t.co/ogh4HgVKtw
More antigay slurs from incelmute.
https://t.co/ECNfR1oLAD
Here's incelmute on Instagram using the "R" word as an insult.
https://t.co/Wym7aD1Us5
Incelmute making fun of Japanese people for no particular reason. Just to do it.
https://t.co/jSbvJToXs5
Wow. This one is bad. Incelmute has a problematic history with the "R" word.
https://t.co/RH4pYH03pX
I wonder what this means?
https://t.co/Bd17vk7HGU
Now we're starting to get a sense of how incelmute feels about "R" word people.
https://t.co/P13ZaGSPhv
Here's another example.
https://t.co/Ba3mie5704

More from Court

Some initial observations about this case, and in particular what the Court of Appeal made of the Attorney General’s application to refer these sentences as “unduly lenient”.

Spoiler: it makes uncomfortable reading for the Attorney General.


First, by way of background. I was one of several commentators astonished that the Attorney General, who has no known experience of practising criminal law, decided to personally present this serious case at the Court of Appeal.

It appeared an overtly political decision.


Comments leaked to the press confirmed this was a political decision, to capitalise on a tragic case in the headlines.

A “friend” of the Attorney General told the Express that she was pursuing the case *against* legal advice. She also took a preemptive pop at the judges.


On the day of the hearing, it appeared from selected reports that the AG was out of her depth. She appeared to be making political submissions to the Court of Appeal that have no place in a case of this type.


The Court of Appeal judgment helps understand what happened.

The AG played a limited role. She “rehearsed some of the facts and said that the sentences had caused widespread public concern”

Her contribution was seemingly not considered by the Court to be legal submissions. Oof.

You May Also Like