1. Visit my website, Fighting Monarch, to learn how CIA uses cybernetics, hypnotism, drugs, and horrific sexual abuse to enslave people & to warp their sexuality.
#hefner #playboy #playboyplaymates #mkultra #projectmonarch #mindcontrol #cia #mi7 #tavistock #newworldorder #nwo
More from Conspiracy
Library update: https://t.co/UvQcjVtxP4
https://t.co/gInQuwg7aq
Remember to register in the Common Law
Common Law
Common Cause
That's where questioning lockdown took me, and this is where they're headed.
— Pharoah Maskfree McFlightrisk (@trestrange) November 8, 2020
Google these linked terms and ask why a reset has an off button.
Shhh...https://t.co/26ebWCY2Ru pic.twitter.com/j3Uvkt822b
https://t.co/gInQuwg7aq
Remember to register in the Common Law
Common Law
Common Cause
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
