More from Cnxitlongterm
#CNXIT https://t.co/bJeKTMoCji
The current formation might look like a falling wedge, but the way moving averages are placed, it looks like a falling wedge which can lead to a parabolic downmove for the marked target. #CNXIT pic.twitter.com/GmXOI3HmUN
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) May 10, 2022
Weekly chart.
Each Fibonacci retracement level shown in #box likely to be tested in time to come.
#Perspective https://t.co/aDDZJV2KE3
#CNXIT-36442#NiFTY IT
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) March 25, 2022
Weekly chart.
Objective is to creat lower top against ATH.(39446.70)
MACD showing negative divergence. Attract selling pressure in time to come.#Probability pic.twitter.com/hPx8SMpeoo
#CNXIT
Watching the marked zone to be tested. If it doesn't cross it, then most probably a parabolic downmove towards 24k. That would lead to even large caps cracking just like Small and Midcaps. #CNXIT https://t.co/FxbzP5vlBr pic.twitter.com/FSqcSqTQM9
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 21, 2022
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".