https://t.co/hMRH45G1cY
@ianrowley677 @chimera414 @BrknMan @ancistroneura @sueytonius @swcrisis @eloarefab @BailFund_Brawl @IngersolRobert @OscarsWild1 @RuleByLogic @KCTaz @Kenneth72712993 @alshalloway @ClimatePatriot @joetheatheistp @insane_voice @TheDisproof @Ceist8 @BradPKeyes @Fauntleroy1934 @DawnTJ90 @Jamz129 @JsharkJill @Tangomitteckel @joedieseldodge @BadgersNo @fknsavages27 @SimonPearson961 @JoeTheAtheist @CMorrisonEsq @maya_phd @CymaticWave @Schtickery @ClimateDepot @stevenmosher @Willard1951 @Tokyo_Tom @jc_Craze @DanCady @PolAnimalAus @ZombiePiano @SimonMaxfield8 @CrangusShish @Gladfly1 @AtomsksSanakan @leonardjcohen @FrankWi74044551 [1/14] It is very sad that @NatGeo is now publishing such disinformation. The article is lies.
The Earth is greening, thanks to elevated CO2 -- especially in arid
https://t.co/hMRH45G1cY
https://t.co/skFrhlN78Q
https://t.co/PeTJ747Q2q
https://t.co/Ts9tEegTr7
Rising CO2 levels mitigate drought impacts. Elevated CO2 (eCO2) helps plants use water more efficiently, by improving CO2 stomatal conductance relative to transpiration. It's especially helpful in arid regions & during drought. Here's a paper about corn:https://t.co/lZ0wL4Gnvn
— Dave Burton \u274c (@ncdave4life) August 19, 2020
https://t.co/0WLLhr49BS
https://t.co/uBBKitKhlp
Plus, elevated CO2 is VERY beneficial for agriculture — a fact known to science for >100 years.
https://t.co/R6kXDd1yLX
https://t.co/fcijxLkG2U
https://t.co/Ew49yJznQy
Ending famine is a VERY Big Deal, comparable to ending war and disease. Compare:
— Dave Burton \u274c (@ncdave4life) December 18, 2019
\u25cf 1918 flu pandemic killed 2% of world population.
\u25cf WWII killed 2.7% of world population.
\u25cf The global drought & famine of 1876-78 killed 3.7% of world population.
https://t.co/DxW7nb4P5i
The imagined major harms of manmade climate change simply are not happening. For instance, sea-level trends haven't changed significantly since the 1920s.https://t.co/cUTnRhnLnQ
— Dave Burton \u274c (@ncdave4life) November 25, 2020
https://t.co/cUTnRhnLnQ
https://t.co/qsb2jLJFbS
https://t.co/TyJybmvO8B
https://t.co/PRWOdlM0YU
The major harms are all merely hypothetical (& mostly implausible). The benefits are real, measured & very large.
https://t.co/OFwigReQge
To learn about #ClimateChange see:https://t.co/bDDNCzj9VC
— Dave Burton \u274c (@ncdave4life) January 9, 2020
It has:
\u25cf accurate intro climatology info
\u25cf in-depth science from BOTH skeptics & alarmists
\u25cf links to balanced debates between experts on BOTH sides
\u25cf info about climate impacts
\u25cf links to best blogs on BOTH sides
More from Climate change
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".