As we continue to recap our work for the #VIADUCT_EU project over the years, take a look below at our thirteen VIADUCT Newsletters!

These are where we kept our network and you up to date of all our activities

/THREAD

Our first newsletter kicked off the #VIADUCT_EU project with an editorial from our project leaders @FundaTekin17 of @IEP_Berlin and Wolfgang Wessels of @UniCologne

➡️ https://t.co/CGAfy4Iixr

/2
In this early newsletter, @tomas_weiss wrote a fascinating piece on relations between the EU and Turkey after PESCO

➡️ https://t.co/hTSBVwyTRZ

/3
Check out Meltem Müftüler Baç's editorial here on the future of the EU-Turkey partnership in the early days of the #VIADUCT_EU project

➡️ https://t.co/QIpaupSqtM

/4
"Arranging EU-Turkey cooperation in the era of transactional leadership" was the title of the @FIIA_fi Senior Research Fellow @ToniAlaranta's editorial in this #VIADUCT_EU Newsletter

➡️ https://t.co/0EywTlirOT

/5
#Migration remains a political hot potato: in this editorial, Angeliki Dimitriadi from @eliamepgr tackles the question of how this issue factors into EU-Turkey relations

➡️ https://t.co/QfTUkx3By3

/6
But what about energy relations? In this editorial from April 2019, @JohannesPollak and @ElinaBru analyse the complications which arise in EU-Turkey energy relations

➡️ https://t.co/glaDgvepPX

/7
"Which future for the EU-Turkey relationship? Domestic politics and external differentiation"

Frank Schimmelfennig from @ETH_en tackles this question, which is also of interest to those of you interested in #DifferentiatedIntegration and #InDivEU

➡️ https://t.co/yPTFzbVMv5

/8
As we moved into the Autumn of 2019, #Erdogan began threatening border policy changes which would risk another #RefugeeCrisis - check out the #VIADUCT_EU analysis by Jean Marcou from @SciencesPo38

➡️ https://t.co/Oa25b5VPYu

/9
Dr. Julie Smith contributed a fascinating editorial to this December 2019 #VIADUCT_EU Newsletter

➡️ https://t.co/lgd1r1eZDA

/10
"The rollercoaster ride of EU-Turkey relations has mostly been a product of the norms versus interests dilemma”

➡️ https://t.co/bG9DROahBO

/11
Meltem Müftüler-Baç returned to the #VIADUCT_EU Newsletter in May of 2020 to discuss: "Turbulence in Turkey’s relations with the EU: Drifting apart in a world of increased uncertainty and refugee flows"

➡️ https://t.co/X80jmvu4M7

/12
READ: "EU Faces Historic Dilemma vis-á-vis the EU-Turkey Relationship", by @manisth from @eliamepgr

➡️ https://t.co/B1rZ3yF6Rb

/13
Of course in our final #VIADUCT_EU Newsletter release at the end of 2020, @FundaTekin17 of @IEP_Berlin and Wolfgang Wessels of @UniCologne, in their roles in the #VIADUCT_EU leadership, returned to the editorial to recap our project's work

➡️ https://t.co/LLikQLXxhQ

/ENDS
@threadreaderapp please unroll

More from Brexit

#Brexitadventcalendar

31 liars & hypocrites who facilitated brexit

Some are mad, some are bad

All are millionaires, some are billionaires

They’ll profit from UK companies failing, keep their money abroad to avoid UK tax and travel freely with their EU passports

#RejoinEU


https://t.co/mZRr9u1RPb


https://t.co/BY6hKloR9d


https://t.co/NdC0ltLeSM


https://t.co/BLnRLotso7
So many stories of new barriers to trade between UK and EU, but you might be thinking at some point these will run out. The government is certainly hoping so. Well they may slow down, but trade relations and regulations are not static, and changes will lead to further problems.

The likelihood of continued trade problems for a £650 bn trade relationship is why there should be a huge cross-government effort led by the Foreign Office and Department for International Trade to put in place the necessary resources to seek best results.

There isn't.

So the UK's relationship with the EU currently consists of two not particularly good deals and no consistent effort to manage current problems or prevent future ones. Joint committees are a second order problem to putting in place the right internal structures.

But that's been the consistent UK problem in relations with the EU since 2016. Lack of focus on getting the right internal structures, people, asks, strategy, too much attention on being tough and a single leader.

News just in. This doesn't necessarily mean the right structure being put into UK-EU relations. I suspect Frost's main role is to ensure no renegotiations with the EU.

Also, wonder what this says about the PM's trust in Michael Gove?

You May Also Like

Following @BAUDEGS I have experienced hateful and propagandist tweets time after time. I have been shocked that an academic community would be so reckless with their publications. So I did some research.
The question is:
Is this an official account for Bahcesehir Uni (Bau)?


Bahcesehir Uni, BAU has an official website
https://t.co/ztzX6uj34V which links to their social media, leading to their Twitter account @Bahcesehir

BAU’s official Twitter account


BAU has many departments, which all have separate accounts. Nowhere among them did I find @BAUDEGS
@BAUOrganization @ApplyBAU @adayBAU @BAUAlumniCenter @bahcesehirfbe @baufens @CyprusBau @bauiisbf @bauglobal @bahcesehirebe @BAUintBatumi @BAUiletisim @BAUSaglik @bauebf @TIPBAU

Nowhere among them was @BAUDEGS to find
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?