Apparently Boris Johnson's ready made deal did include a trade deal as it's main point after all...

(It didn't and this is just another example of how Brexit is driven by constant deceit)

For those keeping track, as of this week the rule was:
The EU are negotiating in bad faith because they aren't giving us the trade deal the WA guarantees.

Today:
The WA definitely doesn't guarantee a trade deal.
I don't mind making these notifications, but as Brexit goes on I think we might need a government institution to keep track of what was said, done, and written down as it changes from day to day.
Oh, and in case you missed it, before this week: Everybody knew we were explicitly voting to leave the Single Market take back control of all our laws and the ECJ.

From this week:
Remainers radicalised the leavers into leaving the Single Market, the ECJ and repatriating our laws
Oh, gosh. If only it was as simple as Schrodinger's cat. Once Schrodinger's box is open, and if the cat is dead, the cat remains dead. In the Brexit example, we can close the box up, and still not know if the cat will be alive or dead on opening it again.

https://t.co/Z5VcsZtMVq
We definitely need a Ministry of Moving Facts, preferably with a dedicated History revisionism department.
It's all very well saying that Eurosceptics revised history perfectly well inside the EEC and even before we joined the Common Market, but times have changed.
It was a whole 3 years before Anti-Marketeers were claiming that all the things they had said had come true, even though none of them had come true.
With today's rolling media, the adoption of populism, and a partisan press than ensures politicians don't face accountability, 3 years is just not going to be fast enough.
We really need a modern institution that alerts people when history changes.
How is the modern British person going to know when an indisputable fact known for hundreds of years has now become a politicised opinion? Citizens need to know this.
People keep telling me I should help with Brexit, well there you go. The Ministry of Moving facts.

Get on it, Prime Minister.
I'd also like to point out that it is a fact that we could always have had a ministry of moving facts inside the EU. Or at least we could today, that fact may change tomorrow.
See what I mean? We really really need this ministry!

You May Also Like

These 10 threads will teach you more than reading 100 books

Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)


10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)


Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)


10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)
IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BHAGWAT PURAN

It was Ved Vyas who edited the eighteen thousand shlokas of Bhagwat. This book destroys all your sins. It has twelve parts which are like kalpvraksh.

In the first skandh, the importance of Vedvyas


and characters of Pandavas are described by the dialogues between Suutji and Shaunakji. Then there is the story of Parikshit.
Next there is a Brahm Narad dialogue describing the avtaar of Bhagwan. Then the characteristics of Puraan are mentioned.

It also discusses the evolution of universe.(
https://t.co/2aK1AZSC79 )

Next is the portrayal of Vidur and his dialogue with Maitreyji. Then there is a mention of Creation of universe by Brahma and the preachings of Sankhya by Kapil Muni.


In the next section we find the portrayal of Sati, Dhruv, Pruthu, and the story of ancient King, Bahirshi.
In the next section we find the character of King Priyavrat and his sons, different types of loks in this universe, and description of Narak. ( https://t.co/gmDTkLktKS )


In the sixth part we find the portrayal of Ajaamil ( https://t.co/LdVSSNspa2 ), Daksh and the birth of Marudgans( https://t.co/tecNidVckj )

In the seventh section we find the story of Prahlad and the description of Varnashram dharma. This section is based on karma vaasna.
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.

Always. No, your company is not an exception.

A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.

Listen to Aditya


And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.

I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.

You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.

Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]