Two diverse sciences ...spirituality and investing ..its a magic when I apply one to enable other ...
ππππ
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5dxTfjVUAAaOWd.jpg)
More from Lazy Turtle π’π’π’
Only one word for this Tweet - GoldMine !!
Awesome stuff .. take a bow @sahil_vi ji
Thank you for sharing and efforts !! ππππ
Awesome stuff .. take a bow @sahil_vi ji
Thank you for sharing and efforts !! ππππ
A lot of people ask: how do you find companies to invest in? very good question.
— Sahil Sharma (@sahil_vi) July 6, 2021
How did you find RACL, Pix?
Creating this ad-hoc thread to share my process.
if you like it, please RT to benefit maximum investors. \U0001f64f
More from Bookstoread
Good Books for learning Price Action.
First two are good enough, if you want to really go in depth then go for 3rd one by Al Brooks later (Its only for serious and committed learners, as its too detailed and would tire out a casual reader). https://t.co/2Vgq5gCVXL
First two are good enough, if you want to really go in depth then go for 3rd one by Al Brooks later (Its only for serious and committed learners, as its too detailed and would tire out a casual reader). https://t.co/2Vgq5gCVXL
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNANEBLXMAIv_Ph.jpg)
Book name plz
— \ufe0e (@12354368ys_g) March 4, 2022
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thingβphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5bpvjXQAEMxB1.jpg)
Also a "man" thingβphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5cWdfXQAA501l.jpg)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp5dUCgWwAAqUSL.jpg)
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?