I don't expect either to happen in 2021, but have to pay attention to these.
1/ The #Bitcoin bear case has two two components:
The macro, and the miners.
THREAD 👇
I don't expect either to happen in 2021, but have to pay attention to these.
=> the more capacity installed, the higher the difficulty, and the higher the cost.
These are the happy times.
Here's an old thread on that topic. Mind that the bitcoin produced a month is now 27,375, or about 900 a day. This quantity halved in May.
https://t.co/PPPtXM6hOB
1/ A thread on bitcoin mining game theory.
— Alex Kr\xfcger (@krugermacro) October 10, 2019
The Bitcoin network produces approximately 54,750 bitcoin a month in block rewards.
Every month. pic.twitter.com/l7Y6BElamT
That's why hashrate increases lag price increases.
This adds to reflexivity and helps prices further up.
Miners did hold inventories back late 2020, but their selling volumes have already increased in 2021, with price in the 30s-40s.
1800 bitcoin/day * $10,000 = $18,000,000/day
900 bitcoin/day * 35,000 = $31,500,000/day
@cryptoquant_com
@glassnode
@thetokenanalyst
All require a subscription unfortunately.
I mostly use CryptoQuant: https://t.co/AaOPJjxt7h
Their founder @ki_young_ju shares very useful data on Twitter.
More from Bitcoin
1. China PlusToken FUD: Old news. Please see linked thread.
2. U.S. Treasury FUD: Read thread below...
$BTC:
— David Puell (@kenoshaking) November 27, 2020
1/ So here's the deal with all the PlusToken news we've been seeing recently in the crypto media. Thing is, tho it's just being reported now after the Chinese government put out official balances, @ErgoBTC blew this story open for the on-chain community over a year ago... https://t.co/epNjZaNcJ1
1/ These news are much more relevant, as they imply severe trade-offs for people who want to keep their bitcoins undoxxed, with the cost and risks of doing so. I would not disqualify the tweet as mere FUD in the sense that what he posted is false. It should be taken seriously.
2/ For all we know, his decision of making it public before TG weekend may come out of the urgency of informing CT of a poignant anti-Bitcoin move by a Trump administration trying to cut lose ends before leaving office—not just "price manipulation" as I've seen suggested around.
3/ It implies the acceleration of a process already planned for for months in advance, not something he just came up with to "crash the market."
4/ In practicality, assuming this passes, it will have two major consencuences:
a. Armstrong's analysis is correct. And I would go further in saying, this regulation would leave the U.S. severely handicapped to continue to be the leader in the cryptocurrency industry worldwide.
Exceptional listen on #Bitcoin.
— Joseph Skewes (@josephskewes) January 26, 2021
In particular Nic's responses to Mike's aggressive anti-BTC stance.
One dispute with Nic: Even if crypto mail list was best place to announce BTC, if Satoshi wanted fair distribution, surely creating 50% of the supply by Nov 2012 was too fast? https://t.co/e1Hpx4wWOu
#Bitcoin transaction is never really final, given the energy required to keep the network running, and obviously its scale issues will only grow over time. That said, I actually though @nic__carter "won" the debate as it were, and I was unconvinced by the threat to national 2/n
security or undermining Fed policy angles Mike put forward. Two areas that are super interesting to me. One is the issue of #Bitcoin ownership, and how concentrated it is in terms of a small % of addresses that own most of it (2% addresses > 95% of holdings I think). 3/n
made great point a lot of this is omnibus/exchange related - so exchange or fund - ie @Grayscale holds #bitcoin for multiple investors. That may well be true - but it brings up 2 other issues. One - it proves that #bitcoin doesn't really "work" without 4/n
centralisation - as this implies most people need exchanges or funds (or @Paypal) to buy it. If so, that kills off a major "bitcoin is better than gold argument" - as in reality, gold is way more decentralised (from mine supply to ownership distribution). It also brings up a 5/n
#BTC https://t.co/Yd4iZqC42s
I don't know why Crypto YouTubers are so bullish on BTC right from the top \U0001f61b while the charts are saying something else. Won't be surprised to see the entire retracement of the marked rise. #BTC pic.twitter.com/SQJkjAfZme
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) April 30, 2022