Balaji Amines - Further upside. Keep trailing. It was expensive at 1500 and it is expensive at 3500++
More from The_Chartist 📈
I have mentioned before too good material on RS
1. A Book written by Sir @Prashantshah267 as attached
2. Research paper by @MebFaber April 2010
3. A book written by Sir Robert A. Levy as attached
4. Webinar by Sir @premalparekh with @vivbajaj
5. Video by @jfahmy on YT https://t.co/xg4fe09ImL
1. A Book written by Sir @Prashantshah267 as attached
2. Research paper by @MebFaber April 2010
3. A book written by Sir Robert A. Levy as attached
4. Webinar by Sir @premalparekh with @vivbajaj
5. Video by @jfahmy on YT https://t.co/xg4fe09ImL
Hi sir ..can u post some articles or write up on relative strength ,how to use same and what is the criteria .. kindly help
— Nanda (@vk_nandagopal) December 11, 2021
You are seriously missing a lot of information if you are not maintaining a trading journal. It is much better if you also take a snap of the charts you trade for the post-analysis.
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
This exercise will tell you about your inherent strengths & weaknesses. 👇👇
How to record a trading journal (TJ) & what to analyze?
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) December 14, 2021
What is in a TJ?
Buy Date
Stock Name
The time frame you analyzed (D/W/M)
Long/Short?
Buy Price
SL
Sell Price
Risk took (% of capital)
Sell date
No. of days held
P/L
P/L as % of capital
Buy Reason?
Invested capital/trade pic.twitter.com/WnrvmYuOV0
More from Balajiamines
Bullish commentry by
#BalajiAmines
1800 CR Revenue guidelines in fy22 with 26% Margin
Still trade in discount compare to #AlkylAmines
#BalajiAmines
1800 CR Revenue guidelines in fy22 with 26% Margin
Still trade in discount compare to #AlkylAmines
#BalajiAmines\u2019 up 13% this week & over 300% this year so far. @_soniashenoy & @SurabhiUpadhyay speak to MD, D Ram Reddy who says that they will come up with the Acetonitrile plant next financial year. @sonalbhutra pic.twitter.com/7bGxfz8xiO
— CNBC-TV18 (@CNBCTV18News) August 27, 2021
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
THE MEANING, SIGNIFICANCE AND HISTORY OF SWASTIK
The Swastik is a geometrical figure and an ancient religious icon. Swastik has been Sanatan Dharma’s symbol of auspiciousness – mangalya since time immemorial.
The name swastika comes from Sanskrit (Devanagari: स्वस्तिक, pronounced: swastik) &denotes “conducive to wellbeing or auspicious”.
The word Swastik has a definite etymological origin in Sanskrit. It is derived from the roots su – meaning “well or auspicious” & as meaning “being”.
"सु अस्ति येन तत स्वस्तिकं"
Swastik is de symbol through which everything auspicios occurs
Scholars believe word’s origin in Vedas,known as Swasti mantra;
"🕉स्वस्ति ना इन्द्रो वृधश्रवाहा
स्वस्ति ना पूषा विश्ववेदाहा
स्वस्तिनास्तरक्ष्यो अरिश्तनेमिही
स्वस्तिनो बृहस्पतिर्दधातु"
It translates to," O famed Indra, redeem us. O Pusha, the beholder of all knowledge, redeem us. Redeem us O Garudji, of limitless speed and O Bruhaspati, redeem us".
SWASTIK’s COSMIC ORIGIN
The Swastika represents the living creation in the whole Cosmos.
Hindu astronomers divide the ecliptic circle of cosmos in 27 divisions called https://t.co/sLeuV1R2eQ this manner a cross forms in 4 directions in the celestial sky. At centre of this cross is Dhruva(Polestar). In a line from Dhruva, the stars known as Saptarishi can be observed.
The Swastik is a geometrical figure and an ancient religious icon. Swastik has been Sanatan Dharma’s symbol of auspiciousness – mangalya since time immemorial.
The name swastika comes from Sanskrit (Devanagari: स्वस्तिक, pronounced: swastik) &denotes “conducive to wellbeing or auspicious”.
The word Swastik has a definite etymological origin in Sanskrit. It is derived from the roots su – meaning “well or auspicious” & as meaning “being”.
"सु अस्ति येन तत स्वस्तिकं"
Swastik is de symbol through which everything auspicios occurs
Scholars believe word’s origin in Vedas,known as Swasti mantra;
"🕉स्वस्ति ना इन्द्रो वृधश्रवाहा
स्वस्ति ना पूषा विश्ववेदाहा
स्वस्तिनास्तरक्ष्यो अरिश्तनेमिही
स्वस्तिनो बृहस्पतिर्दधातु"
It translates to," O famed Indra, redeem us. O Pusha, the beholder of all knowledge, redeem us. Redeem us O Garudji, of limitless speed and O Bruhaspati, redeem us".
SWASTIK’s COSMIC ORIGIN
The Swastika represents the living creation in the whole Cosmos.
Hindu astronomers divide the ecliptic circle of cosmos in 27 divisions called https://t.co/sLeuV1R2eQ this manner a cross forms in 4 directions in the celestial sky. At centre of this cross is Dhruva(Polestar). In a line from Dhruva, the stars known as Saptarishi can be observed.
