Donating to the needy.
Helping the elderly and poor.
Respecting yours & other's time.
Being humble.
Inculcating structure & discipline.
Starting a new regime, a routine.
Keep it simple, remove all clutter.
Walking barefoot on grass.
Saturn is Kaal (time)
When the time (Saturn) is in your favour even your mistakes turn into a good strategy.
When time (Saturn) isn't in your favour then even your good actions will seem like a mistake.
Respect Time, Respect Saturn.
No Success without Saturn's blessings.
More from Spiritual GPS Service
More from Astroremedies
Source of money in our life is indicated by dignity & position of Jupiter.
As jupiter being the karaka of 2nd, 5th, 10th & 11th house in astrology.
2nd H is the house of money & finance it the the Dhana Bhava. Jupiter is graha of expansion. One of the best house for Jupiter.
Jupiter in fifth house is also considered most auspicious position as Fifth house is known for intelligence ,artistic pursuits and it is bhavat bhavam of 9th house of luck / bhagya.
Both 10th and 11th houses are Upachaya sthan means 'growth', 'advancement', 'prosperity'. Auspicious graha of expansion Jupiter works great in these houses. Jupiter give wealth, success, luck and fame in business or profession.
Some jupiter remedies to enhance benefic results of Jupiter in a chart.
As jupiter being the karaka of 2nd, 5th, 10th & 11th house in astrology.
2nd H is the house of money & finance it the the Dhana Bhava. Jupiter is graha of expansion. One of the best house for Jupiter.
Jupiter in fifth house is also considered most auspicious position as Fifth house is known for intelligence ,artistic pursuits and it is bhavat bhavam of 9th house of luck / bhagya.
Both 10th and 11th houses are Upachaya sthan means 'growth', 'advancement', 'prosperity'. Auspicious graha of expansion Jupiter works great in these houses. Jupiter give wealth, success, luck and fame in business or profession.
Some jupiter remedies to enhance benefic results of Jupiter in a chart.
\u2022Jupiter - keep your North east direction always clean and keep deities pictures there. Donate yellow cloths,Saffron , turmeric
— \U0001f940\U0001d434\U0001d451\U0001d456\U0001d443\U0001d44e\U0001d45f\U0001d44e\U0001d460\u210e\U0001d44e\U0001d458\U0001d461\U0001d456\u0950 \U0001f531 (@AdiParashaktiA) June 19, 2021
or bananas to needy people on Thursday. Wearing gold also strengthen Jupiter.
You May Also Like
1/ Some initial thoughts on personal moats:
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.