I was having a conversation with a friend the other day about why it was so important for Democrats to win the House in November. He has become so disillusioned with both parties that he could not see the bigger picture. He doesn’t follow politics closely. My reply? #WhyVoteBlue

Like many people my friend is not a political wonk. He is disgusted by what Trump is doing to this country. But he also sees Trump as a symptom of a much larger problem within our political system. He is not convinced that there is anyone in either party that will bring change
We started talking about how different this class of Democratic candidates are than previous years. How many have committed not to take PAC money. How many are younger, progressive, and diverse. How many are not ok with the status quo. #WhyVoteBlue
For him it will require SEEING with his own eyes what I believe to be true. So. Now it’s up to you Democrats. You’ve got a shot to convince my friend that it won’t be back to business as usual. Are you up to it? Because there will be millions of Americans watching. #WhyVoteBlue
November 6 is just the beginning. It’s what happens in the next 2 years that will set the stage for our future. I convinced my friend to give Democrats a chance. Who will you convince? The clock is ticking. #WhyVoteBlue

More from All

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x