1/ On Bitcoin and similar protocols....

Decentralization and cryptography are vectors to disrupt the economics of violence.

Centralizable power is a lure too impossible to resist and this creates incentives for using violence to attain it.

2/ This has given rise to the mega-nation-state.

And so, we fight for control of this central power so we can use violence to show others how ‘correct’ our own world-view is.

But as @balajis says “No amount of violence can solve a math equation.”
3/ And in this fact we can begin to replace violence with security.

Because, for a universe sufficiently complex to create us, factoring must be more difficult than multiplying.

And because of this, cryptography is possible.
4/ And because of this it is possible to secure information mathematically such that no amount of violence can break it.

By combining decentralization with cryptography, we have a system for information that is resistant to violence.

Security over violence.

More from All

How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?

Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!

Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

🧵👇(1 / 12)


Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.

Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)

The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (
https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).

The secret is *balance* (3/12)

Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:

1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.

2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)

By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.

Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)

You May Also Like