1. Trading system

A trading system is the offensive weapon to get more money.

- Learn the basics (market structures, R/S, candlesticks patterns, etc.)
- Find 1 or 2 killer setups
- Backtest and store past data (WR, RRR, etc.)
- Trade
2. Risk management

Risk management is the defensive weapon to protect your money.

- For 30 days focus only on risk (not money)
- Store data and check progress (in the meanwhile you develop some self-discipline and consistency)
- Repeat
3. Psychology

Psychology is the tool to control your offensive and defensive weapons.

- Think in probabilities (Everyone can lose the next trade)
- Think long term (1 trade is nothing, 1000 trades are everything)
- Use mistakes and failures as fuel to become a better trader
4. Mix everything together

Trading is much more than a trading system.

- Without a profitable trading system you cannot get more money
- Without proper risk management you cannot protect your money
- Without a proper mindset you cannot survive in the long term
If you enjoyed this thread, please:

1. Subscribe to (@MoneyTradeEdge) newsletter (link in bio)

2. Retweet the 1st tweet below to share this thread https://t.co/p2U9Ugl8lj

More from All

Master Thread of all my threads!

Hello!! 👋

• I have curated some of the best tweets from the best traders we know of.

• Making one master thread and will keep posting all my threads under this.

• Go through this for super learning/value totally free of cost! 😃

1. 7 FREE OPTION TRADING COURSES FOR


2. THE ABSOLUTE BEST 15 SCANNERS EXPERTS ARE USING

Got these scanners from the following accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sanjufunda
3. @sanstocktrader
4. @SouravSenguptaI
5. @Rishikesh_ADX


3. 12 TRADING SETUPS which experts are using.

These setups I found from the following 4 accounts:

1. @Pathik_Trader
2. @sourabhsiso19
3. @ITRADE191
4.


4. Curated tweets on HOW TO SELL STRADDLES.

Everything covered in this thread.
1. Management
2. How to initiate
3. When to exit straddles
4. Examples
5. Videos on

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x