https://t.co/XUhcX7gSNM
YouTube is a free University
You can become a person of value in a matter of months
Here are the TOP 10 YouTube videos that will accelerate your personal & financial growth:
1. Work ethic.
2. Become a millionaire with your 9-5.
3. Master self-discipline.
4. The 5 AM rules.
5. Read Effectively.
6. Managing your money.
7. 5 rules of creating a business.
8. Eliminate negative influences.
9. Destroy fear.
10. Maintain high-quality sleep.
If you enjoyed this thread, please retweet so others can as well.
My goal is to help you transform your life by sharing insights on:
* Money
* Personal Finance
* Investing
* Personal Development
Follow me
@Successhark
for more content like this.
YouTube is a free University
— Harvey Macallan\U0001f988 (@Successhark) October 26, 2022
You can become a person of value in a matter of months
Here are the TOP 10 YouTube videos that will accelerate your personal & financial growth:
More from All
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?