YouTube is a free University

You can become a person of value in a matter of months

Here are the TOP 10 YouTube videos that will accelerate your personal & financial growth:

1 | 4 Steps to develop an INSANE work ethic

https://t.co/XUhcX7gSNM
2 | How to become a millionaire with a 9-5

https://t.co/dck0q3kukP
3 | 12 Tricks to master self-discipline

https://t.co/htyQpHWPcX
4 | 10 Benefits of starting your day at 5 AM

https://t.co/aKeH7RrN1o
5 | 7 Tips to read effectively

https://t.co/dD2zo6Ajnv
6 | Budget your income by the 50/30/20 rule

https://t.co/gGZcBwOjKx
7 | Elon Musk's 5 rules of creating a business

https://t.co/e3IMxh3bMt
8 | Learn to eliminate negative influences

https://t.co/hvk5yPGzsI
9 | 10 Ways to destroy ANY fear

https://t.co/bgMtUBvvIx
10 | 6 Key elements for high-quality sleep

https://t.co/y465nJCaSe
TL;DR

1. Work ethic.
2. Become a millionaire with your 9-5.
3. Master self-discipline.
4. The 5 AM rules.
5. Read Effectively.
6. Managing your money.
7. 5 rules of creating a business.
8. Eliminate negative influences.
9. Destroy fear.
10. Maintain high-quality sleep.
Thanks for reading.

If you enjoyed this thread, please retweet so others can as well.

My goal is to help you transform your life by sharing insights on:

* Money
* Personal Finance
* Investing
* Personal Development

Follow me
@Successhark
for more content like this.
https://t.co/34Z69jDMJX

More from All

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?