Take the path of least resistance.
The goal of every entrepreneur should be:
#1. Gain financial freedom
and
#2. Maximize probability of achieving #1
A hill I'll die on:
95% of entrepreneurs should forget about technology (a few big fish and a lot of sophisticated fishermen) and focus on small business (small fish everywhere and really crappy fishermen).
A THREAD:
Take the path of least resistance.
The goal of every entrepreneur should be:
#1. Gain financial freedom
and
#2. Maximize probability of achieving #1
You can start doing what makes you happy.
And you can positively impact a lot more people with project #2, 3, 4 etc. You're in a position to try to change the world if you have financial freedom.
The odds part. The risk. The probability.
Sure you hit big. And we see the folks who did all over twitter.
But what about the other 95% who tried but couldn't achieve #1?
How can I maximize my gain and minimize my risk?
How much cash do I really need to try to win on this hand?
$100k a year in passive income is enough for most folks.
Just not having to go to a job they don't like would change everything for most folks.
The amount of small businesses in America that absolutely print money and still do business like it’s 1985 is astounding.
Fax machines. Secretaries. Land lines. Written ledgers. Cash payments.
I'm getting moderately wealthy right now by applying out-of-the-box software to self storage facilities.
I'm one of about 100 groups of folks doing exactly this.
Am I innovating? Sure.
Am I taking risk? No.
Am I copying off of others? Sure.
Am I trying to educate a market? No.
So my ask of you:
But look up from your computer screen.
There is a small business 1/2 mile from your house that prints money and does business like its 1985.
Nobody wants to start that business.
Because there is a little bit of sweat. It's not easy. It might take a little bit of physical work (god forbid) in the early days.
More from Nick Huber
Don’t have much cash but want to invest in real estate?
Want to get SBA loans and special loan programs so you can buy real estate investments with only 5-10% down?
One word for you:
Don’t.
Here’s why
👇👇👇
Leverage can be a beautiful thing.
Appreciation takes over and all that value you bought with debt grows and you amplify your returns.
But there is another, darker side of debt.
Values drop 5 or 10% and you’re underwater. You have zero equity or negative equity.
Ask the folks who were over-levered in 2007 what happened on 2011?
Real estate is a frothy space right now. Money flying everywhere and values higher than they’ve ever been.
Debt is cheaper and easier to get than ever.
Will it continue?
Probably.
Money could stay cheap for a long time. There is a ton of negative yielding debt abroad and liquidity ready to flood our market at the drop of a hat.
Rates will likely stay low. Gov will probably keep subsidizing these loans. You’ll probably be okay.
Want to get SBA loans and special loan programs so you can buy real estate investments with only 5-10% down?
One word for you:
Don’t.
Here’s why
👇👇👇
Leverage can be a beautiful thing.
Appreciation takes over and all that value you bought with debt grows and you amplify your returns.
But there is another, darker side of debt.
Everybody I know loves LEVERAGE when it comes to real estate.
— Nick Huber (@sweatystartup) October 18, 2020
It\u2019s a beautiful and scary tool, kicking appreciation, depreciation, and cashflow into overdrive.
It amplifies everything. You can make a lot of money really fast and go broke in months.
Here\u2019s how it works\U0001f447\U0001f447\U0001f447
Values drop 5 or 10% and you’re underwater. You have zero equity or negative equity.
Ask the folks who were over-levered in 2007 what happened on 2011?
Real estate is a frothy space right now. Money flying everywhere and values higher than they’ve ever been.
Debt is cheaper and easier to get than ever.
Will it continue?
Probably.
Money could stay cheap for a long time. There is a ton of negative yielding debt abroad and liquidity ready to flood our market at the drop of a hat.
Rates will likely stay low. Gov will probably keep subsidizing these loans. You’ll probably be okay.
More from All
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
H was always unseen in S2NL :)
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602