[The Future of Luna]

In the community there are many investors that are doubting that $Luna can make a comeback.

However I can assure you that @stablekwon is far from being done.

Let‘s explore how $LUNA is heading into the future by talking a look what’s currently being built!

Before we talk about whats being built next, let’s talk about whats not being built.

Here is a screenshot from Do stating that TFL is currently not building UST 2.0. https://t.co/PHi4F3lU5N
However I am pretty sure, they are going to launch UST 2.0 and I will tell you why at the end of the thread.
Lets first talk about some key information pieces that will bring us to the conclusion that the end goal is UST 2.0.

Luna is implementing new groundbreaking technology in the NFT space. You could say they are inventing NFT 2.0.
One of the most important pieces of NFT 2.0 is the Darwin SDK which will make evolving NFTs possible.

https://t.co/3xcRutachT
One application thats already utilizing this feature is @Terragotchi_nft

https://t.co/zsadqJLpla
However evolving NFTs is only the first technology that is currently being built.

NFTs on Luna will go multi-chain and spread through the #CosmosEcosystem with Andromeda.

https://t.co/PyTTtwQqUs
True Onchain-Randomness will be introduced to Luna NFTs with Entropy.

https://t.co/wgOWAefnuM
But for what do you need these advanced NFTs?

One such use-case is gaming. A true crypto gaming experience does not require the users to pay thousands of dollars up front.
Think about popular games like League of Legends of Counterstrike.

These games are free, yet there is a huge economy and millions of dollars get transacted.
This new groundbreaking technology that is currently being developed on Luna will will make a true crypto gaming experience possible.
There are various other ways to utilize NFT 2.0. Another example is Fountain. We don’t know alot about it yet, but it looks like a dealbreaker to me!

https://t.co/fLF30Cnwzw
Do Kwon (@stablekwon) is creating the building blocks for a true decentralised economy. Similar like he built Chai to support UST.

https://t.co/UGqJ0Xb4R2
Here is what is going to happen:

https://t.co/8tmO4RUP4H is creating the infrastructure for advanced application (for example with NFT 2.0)
2.Thousands of Users will be using these applications and slowly but surely a true and sustainable decentralised economy is formed
3.This economy will be the building block and the support to maintain a new $UST 2.0.
As Do said: A Stablecoin can only work if you have economy to support it.

https://t.co/lwszSKv3vR
And besides that Do’s banner picture is still showing $LUNA and $UST 2.0
Obviously I am biased towards Luna and I do not know if similar technology is being built other chains.

For me Luna is a 3 years + investment and I am just compounding my staking rewards.

More from All

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.