What is EBITDA?

Why is it important?

1/ What does it stand for?

EBITDA is an acronym that stands for:

Earnings
Before
Interest
Taxes
Depreciation
Amortization
2/ Not a GAAP measure

EBITDA is not a number that you will typically see on a company’s financial statements

It’s a measure that companies calculate separately in a 10K filing or one that you could calculate yourself
3/ What does it mean?

You probably have a good idea of what “Profit” is

Profit is what is left over after deducing expenses from a
company’s revenue
EBITDA is an adjusted measure of profit

You can calculate it as follows:

1) Start with Net Profit

2) Add: Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization

3) The result is EBITDA
4/ Is EBITDA better than earnings?

There is no right answer here. It depends on what you’re measuring

I’m fully expecting commentators in this thread quoting Warren Buffet to me saying something along the lines of “EBITDA is a useless measure”
To answer this question, it’s worthwhile to understand:

(i) who invented EBITDA
(ii) who uses EBITDA
5/ Who invented EBITDA?

EBITDA was invented by someone who you've probably never heard of but has had a huge impact on your life: John Malone

John Malone is a billionaire cable operator and investor
John Malone was hell-bent on lowering net income (via interest and depreciation) to pay less tax

So he convinced his investors and lenders to focus on “cash flow” and ignore earnings
In the process, John invented a proxy calculation to quickly arrive at cash flow

By simply focusing higher up the income statement - that’s how he invented EBITDA
6/ Who uses EBITDA?

From personal experience working in equity research

I can tell you that valuations multiples using EBITDA are more frequently used than valuation multiples using earnings
Folks who work in private equity will tell you the same thing:

Focus on EBITDA, not earnings

Why is this?
It’s because EBITDA is an un-levered (before debt) measure

This means EBITDA doesn’t care about how much debt you use to finance your business (that’s why you add back interest)

Let’s look at an example to understand this better:
Let’s assume that you have two companies:

Company A and Company B

Both companies are exactly the same in every aspect:

(i) same industry
(ii) same financial performance
(iii) same size
Company A raises money from investors but has no debt and makes $100K in profit/year

Company B doesn’t raise money but instead uses debt and makes $90K in profit/year after deducting $10K in interest costs per year

Is Company A better than Company B?
No. The two companies are just “funded” differently.

• Company A used equity
• Company B used debt

Funding decisions are not fixed and to a certain extent could be changed
Company A chose to dilute its shareholders and raise equity

Company B decided not to dilute shareholders and use debt

There is nothing stopping Company B from:

• Raising money from investors
• Paying back the debt it carries
• Be as profitable as Company A
Hence, the reason why most professionals in private equity use EBITDA to make comparisons between companies

EBITDA adjusts for how a company is funded making comparisons on an apples-to-apples basis
TL;DR:

1. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure
2. You can calculate EBITDA yourself
3. EBITDA is more frequently used than earnings for valuations
4. EBITDA is an un-levered measure
5. EBITDA ignores how a company is funded
Want to improve your understanding of investing and finance?

Sign up for the course I’m creating with @10Kdiver

https://t.co/dLwOcNdPob
@10kdiver If you enjoyed this thread, retweet it so other people can benefit!

Follow @AliTheCFO

I tweet about:

• Finance
• Business Frameworks
• Personal Growth

More from All

ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.

But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.

Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:

1. KaiberAI

@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.

Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.

New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:

Check here

https://t.co/ivnDRf628L


2. @tldview TLDV

Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.

Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.

Try it now:

https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ


3. ComposeAI

Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.

It’s will help you write better content in seconds.

Try it here:

https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI


4. Browser AI

Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.

Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.

No coding required.

https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO

You May Also Like

🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?