โ— ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ | ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ž๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—”๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐——๐—ฟ. ๐—• .๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ - ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ -๐—œ๐—œ

This Thread is About Most Controversial things About Ambedkar

Continued ..
[1/N]

#AmbedkarJayanti #Ambedkar #Congress #BJP

2 Most Controversial Things of Dr. B. R Ambedkar

1. Burning Manu Smruti on Dec. 25, 1927

2. Riddles in Hinduism A Book written by Dr. B. R Ambedkar ( 1954-1955)

3. Asper Many Dr. B.R Ambedkar is an Atheist

Lets see one by one

[2/N]
Dr. Ambedkar publicly burn The Manu Smruti on Dec. 25, 1927

It was on Dec 25 1927 in the late evening at the conference, that the resolution to burn the Manusmruti was moved by Brahmin associate of Ambedkar, Gangadhar Neelkanth Sahastrabuddhe & was seconded by PN Rajabhoj

[3/N]
In his presidential speech Ambedkar said that the aim of the movement was not only to gain access to the water or the temple or to remove the barriers to commensality.

In the February 3, 1928 issue of the Bahishkrit Bharat (his own newspaper) he explained the action

[4/N]
Meanwhile, condemned by a sudden Court ruling to hold back the satyagraha of drinking water from the public water tank, Dr Ambedkar explained the dilemma faced by on the one hand the government/British Collector and entrenched high caste interests.

[5/N]
"Riddles in Hinduism" A Book writen by Dr. B.R.Ambedkar

This book is compilation of questions that the author Ambedkar, a doctor of law and economics, raises against the Vedic Hinduism. He has asked political, religious and social questions against Vedic brahminism.

[6/N]
RIDDLE NO.1 (THE DIFFICULTY OF KNOWING WHY ONE IS A HINDU)

[7/N]
RIDDLE NO.2 (WHY SUDDENLY THE BRAHMINS DECLARE THE VEDAS TO BE INFALLIBLE AND NOT TO BE QUESTIONED?)

[8/N]
RIDDLE NO.3 (THE RIDDLE OF AHIMSA)

[9/N]
RIDDLE NO.4 (WHY DID THE BRAHMINS MAKE THE HINDU GODS FIGHT AGAINST EACH OTHER?)

[10/N]
RIDDLE NO.5 (HOW DID THE BRAHMINS WED AN AHIMSAK GOD TO A BLOODTHIRSTY GODDESS?)

[11/N]
Other then this In Book there arw Many controversial Statement about Hindu Gods Rama Krishna Mahadav & Bhrama

I Don't want to comment Anything about this Book or what Ambedkar Thinks.

[12/N]
Naturally I Am Curious about this Book & I have Some Questions in my Mind.

1. When did this Book Published 1st time ?
2. Did Ambedkar was Alive & Verified the 1st Copy of Book ?

As for as I know Ambedkar Started Writing this Book in Jan 1954 and completed by Nov 1955.

[13/N]
When I Tried to find Answer to My Questions I came Across this Facts

Riddles in Hinduism is one of his many works B.R. Ambedkar did not get to publish in his lifetime.

[14/N]
Now How the Ambedkar papers come into the possession of the state of Maharashtra and how the state was literally forced into pubยญlishing his works ?

Doesn't it Interesting ?

Refer Attached Pics for Answer

[15/N]
Ambeยญdkar's Tremendous Financial Stress

Read More In Attched Pictures

[16/N]
Now By Reading this any One can Understand that Ambedkar was Not in a Position to Publish His Book By him Self Due to Financial Issues

Will any one Finance to Publish Riddles in Hinduism when its is So controversial ?

[17/N]
Fact : Riddles in Hinduism Book Not Published By Ambedkar its Published after 30 years of His Death in 1987 under BAWS

What us BAWS ?

Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speechesโ€™, known by the acronym BAWS, produced by the Maharashtra governmentโ€™s education department.

[18/N]
Now How Come one can Blame Ambedkar for a Book Which is Published 30 Years after His Death ?

How Come Any one Can Prove that All the Statements in the Book is Made By Ambedkar when there is No Souce Available ?

I leave these 2 Questions to find Answer Your Self ๐Ÿ˜‚

[19/N]
Now Let's Talk About Burning of Manu Smruti

Does Any one Know He Burnt Original Manu Smruti or A Copy of It ?

If it is original then How come He get Access to Original Manusmruti when He is a Dualit ?

I Didn't find Answer for this Question till Now ๐Ÿค”

[20/N]
Now Many People says Dr. B.R Ambedkar is An Atheist

This is complete Base less ๐Ÿ˜‚

If he is An Atheist then Why He Joined Buddhism ? ๐Ÿค”

Any one has Answer for this Question ?

[21/N]
Struggle of Ambedkar's Life

1. Extreme Struggle in Childhood for Everything
2. Fight Against inequality in Society Become Law Mister & Resigned Due to Non Cooperation
3. Financial Crisis Health Problem at Ending Stage of life

i have sympathy for Him

[22/N]
This is End of Ambedkar's Thread

Putting Facts Here is my Intention Notting More then that.

Please Note : Am Not Associated with Any Group of Party

Don't think that I Support Jai Bheem ๐Ÿ˜€ I will Never Support them in my Life ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€

RT & Follow me if You Life my Threads

More from All

You May Also Like

**Thread on Bravery of Sikhs**
(I am forced to do this due to continuous hounding of Sikh Extremists since yesterday)

Rani Jindan Kaur, wife of Maharaja Ranjit Singh had illegitimate relations with Lal Singh (PM of Ranjit Singh). Along with Lal Singh, she attacked Jammu, burnt - https://t.co/EfjAq59AyI


Hindu villages of Jasrota, caused rebellion in Jammu, attacked Kishtwar.

Ancestors of Raja Ranjit Singh, The Sansi Tribe used to give daughters as concubines to Jahangir.


The Ludhiana Political Agency (Later NW Fronties Prov) was formed by less than 4000 British soldiers who advanced from Delhi and reached Ludhiana, receiving submissions of all sikh chiefs along the way. The submission of the troops of Raja of Lahore (Ranjit Singh) at Ambala.

Dabistan a contemporary book on Sikh History tells us that Guru Hargobind broke Naina devi Idol Same source describes Guru Hargobind serving a eunuch
YarKhan. (ref was proudly shared by a sikh on twitter)
Gobind Singh followed Bahadur Shah to Deccan to fight for him.


In Zafarnama, Guru Gobind Singh states that the reason he was in conflict with the Hill Rajas was that while they were worshiping idols, while he was an idol-breaker.

And idiot Hindus place him along Maharana, Prithviraj and Shivaji as saviours of Dharma.
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".