🔥New🔥: Debt servicing costs needn’t keep the chancellor up at night📈, maybe the lack of investment💸 to thwart environmental breakdown should?

With new @ONS public finance stats out where should our priorities lie?
Me for @NEF blog👇👇👇

Not too long ago, the state of public finances was thought to be giving chancellor @RishiSunak ​“sleepless nights”. But then it became clear that the @BankofEngland was helping bankroll the Coronavirus bill. @spencershapland @KateAndrs
In almost a blink of an eye, it was as if the last ten years of devastating public spending cuts may have been for naught, some suggested the 'fig leaf'🍃 had been removed:
As the penny dropped, the majority of public commentary began to show a greater appreciation for the fact that debt and deficit levels are less important than the actual cost of servicing debt.

See here for explainer👇👇👇: https://t.co/hMl4WyAdDr
But just as it seemed the penny was beginning to drop, new excuses for low/borrowing investment were being conjured. Despite borrowing costs having reached historical lows, "deficit fetishism" turned into "inflation and interest rates" fetishism 😱😱😱...
The new fetish means borrowing over the next 5 years is forecast to be 6% lower than in March 2021. As a result, @hmtreasury will only be deploying £25.5bn of 🌍net zero🌍 spending between 2021 – 2025, when it should be at least £30bn a year.
A 1% increase in inflation and interest rates would increase the cost of servicing debt by £23bn. Factoring in higher projected future inflation and interest rates, the @OBR_UK forecast that debt servicing costs will rise to a total of £40 billion in 2022 and 2023.
While these figures should not be taken lightly, and the rising costs of living is serious, there are a number of reasons why we should not rush to the panic button.
As a proportion of the economy, debt servicing costs in 2022 and 2023 will still only be 1.6 and 1.7% of GDP and a percentage of the tax take 4.3% and 3.6%  — similar levels as 2018 – 2019 and still lower than at any time in the preceding three centuries. h/t @JoMicheII
This suggests there is significantly more headroom for borrowing to bring the economy to full output capacity by supporting the low-carbon transition and well-paid green jobs.

See @NEF: CALLING TIME: Replacing the fiscal rules with fiscal referees https://t.co/lKMudLOYn6
There is a separate question around whether interest rates may have to rise because of a sudden loss of investor confidence. Unlikely! In its recent £6 billion sale of green gilts, the UK Debt Management Office (DMO) received £74 billion in subscriptions h/t @billy_blog
What if the BoE decides to raise rates? The first answer is that the Bank shouldn’t raise rates, especially not past that forecasted by the OBR – in response to a largely externally conditioned supply-side crisis and given the frail state of the UK’s economic recovery.
Inflation not being driven by domestic pressures – like an increase in wages and is likely to be transitory. An increase in the Bank’s interest rates will not help solve global supply chain issues, or reduce any of the pain caused by labour shortages associated with Brexit.
Instead it will translate into higher costs for families, raise costs for businesses, weaken the economic recovery. The Eurozone learned a harsh lesson by raising interest rates too soon after the 2008 global financial crisis. See @AntonioFatas
The scenario where base rates go up beyond @OBR_UK forecast, is one where the economy is recovering, jobs and household incomes are up, and overall demand is boosted. Meaning tax receipts are going up + unemployment (other income) transfers to the private sector are falling.
If necessary, the BoE could deploy other credit guidance tools to curb aggregate demand, or the Treasury could raise additional taxes if needed.
See our @jryancollins recently academic published paper (not paywalled)💪💪💪 https://t.co/V1NlgBwW8F
Finally, as a forthcoming NEF @DominicCaddick working paper will illustrate, the @bankofengland could move towards a tiered reserve system, substantially reducing the government’s debt servicing cost all together.
See @WhelanKarl: https://t.co/1lMcdrWBOC
Inflation and its implication for debt servicing costs shouldn’t be taken lightly. But for now, these issues are manageable, if not solvable. With an environmental emergency on our hands – there are other more pressing issues to keep us up at night.


More from All

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit

Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in

1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only

2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
There are advantages and disadvantages - I don't want to go into detail since I don't want to cause any havoc right now because my perspectives on things differ. @NAN_DINI_ @UshaNirmala @ShefVaidya

The main advantage is that APMC mandis in the United States limit primary commodity sales to inside their boundaries, and these mandis have entry restrictions. The majority of the time, the mandi licence is only given to those who own a go down within the APMC.

The e-NAM was established; however, the Centre is dissatisfied with its performance due to the States' lack of enthusiasm.

When we talk about farming issues, our fears and concerns take precedence over a rational approach.

There will be no consultations between state governments and the federal government. Furthermore, agriculture is on the State List, and until recently, States have believed that agriculture trade is solely their domain.

Markets and fairs are listed as Entry 26 in the State List, and trade and commerce inside the State is listed as Entry 24 in the Concurrent List. Entry 33 deals with food trade and commerce inside the state.

You May Also Like

(EXCERPT) PROOF OF COLLUSION drops in 3 weeks. Here's the second set of excerpts from this 450-page, 1,650-endnote book. 4 more excerpts will be released each Monday until the book's November 13 release. I hope you'll RETWEET and consider preordering here: https://t.co/z0ep5wUW9h

2/ For those who missed the first set of excerpts from PROOF OF COLLUSION, they can be seen in the tweet below—click on the link to see the tweet. For the link to preorder PROOF OF COLLUSION, see my currently pinned tweet or the link in my Twitter profile.

PS/ To see a larger, more readily readable version of any of these excerpts, right-click and download the picture to your desktop. Then open the file and it will be much larger and easier to read.

BONUS FACT/ In the last excerpt, I refer to "any aide with whom Trump shared the classified intelligence he received in the [August 17, 2016] briefing." Well you might wonder—who did he share it with? Answer: we don't know.

But we DO know who was WITH HIM at the briefing: FLYNN.

BONUS FACT 2/ According to Mother Jones and Washington Post reporting, then, we know Flynn attended the August 17, 2016 briefing at which Trump was informed of Russian aggression, and THEREAFTER—but BEFORE the election—engaged in clandestine contacts with the Russian ambassador.