"Paid expert" who?
If Yudhiṣṭhira was a "2000-year-old fictional character" inspired by King Ashoka as Romila Thapar's & Devdutts of this world claim, how did Chanakya(320 BC)
the minister of Ashoka's grandfather,mention Yudhiṣṭhira in his Arthaśāstra?
Any ans devdutt Myth? https://t.co/iE5edIrks1
Paid gurus/experts of Hindutva are on a ROLL.... poor Kashmiri Pandits ... lost their homeland to invaders, now losing their philosophy to pseudoscience https://t.co/sImmn8vQ1u
— Devdutt Pattanaik (@devduttmyth) March 10, 2021
how did Pāṇini mention Yudhiṣṭhira in Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95) dating back to atleast 2400 years?
How did Sātavāhanas mention him in inscriptions dating back to 2100 years?
Dropped ur brain somewhere?
Ashoka ruled 200 years after Buddha.
But this genius says Ashoka was born before Yudhiṣṭhira😂
Some of these manuscripts are still housed in Srinagar Museum.
These manuscripts were written on paper even before your Islam was born.
Written with ink on paper recording Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sutra.
The language is Sanskrit & the script is (Proto) Sharada. Dates back to the 6th century CE +
Ancient paper manuscripts were found in remote arid Gilgit but not in a cultural center like Varanasi.
All thanks to the climate!
Testimony of foreign travelers like Yijing(7th CE) confirms the widespread use of paper.
It was Gandhi himself who described Savarkar as Veer (brave)
This is what Gandhi said:
"I met Savarkar in London
He is brave,clever,patriot,revolutionary.
Saw evil of the British Govt much earlier than I did
He is in Andaman(jail) for having loved India"
@MisraNityanand , a Sanskrit scholar and well-known author has studied Devdutt Pattanaik’s book titled “My Gita”.
This is an extensive interview where he gives point by point analysis of Myth’s work.
He points out numerous blunders in the works.
1) does not know even the BASICS of Sanskrit;
2) is obsessed with looking for sexual meanings, and has praised Wendy Doniger in the past;
4) has an artificially inflated brand name that cannot be justified on merit.
& I think he never will.
And even in Social Media this myth @devduttmyth keeps comment section off for not taking risk to expose himself😂
https://t.co/thehx7FsNo
More from All
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
