https://t.co/SbBi7JXX5A
[Thread] Pangolin CoV... or Bat CoV in pangolins samples?
TLDR: A researcher of the team that sequenced the pangolins samples had taken samples in the mine of RaTG13 and in the place where RmYN02 was collected, also catched bats in Yunnan. Probably contaminated pangolin samples
https://t.co/SbBi7JXX5A
https://t.co/Mf0AeRatge
https://t.co/C444TLT6JO

https://t.co/ZNW6sd976T

What if those SARS2-like sequences were not actually in the pangolins and were just mere lab cotamination of a close relative to SARS2 used in the lab? (we have recently seen many other cases of contamination in other samples)
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) November 27, 2020
GIABR have been sampling in Yunnan, even in Mojiang pic.twitter.com/sErzG5ZQVH
https://t.co/KDNirmZ9DX
Pangolin CoV from lab contamination is increasingly evident:
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) February 6, 2021
Liang et al. (2019) [Libiao Zhang] collected bats in Apr-15 in the same location as Zhou et al. (2020b) [Holmes] collected RmYN02 in 2019, with a 100% ident. cyt bhttps://t.co/CQuAbKcUAuhttps://t.co/qZaTEidKZ1 pic.twitter.com/TEej6YQAmz
https://t.co/i7ZdsTURKi

About shoddy safety protocols:
— The Seeker (@TheSeeker268) May 18, 2020
Clumsy students and researchers from Wuhan collecting bat samples with inadequate PPE (sometime around June-July 2019)https://t.co/FsK7jw11hI
Oops, what a coincidence! Libiao Zhang (from GIABR, the lab of pangolins) forgot to mention his paper with WIV in which they isolated viruses collected from "Mojiang" (sic). He did not forget the other paper with them (in same journal a few issues before) https://t.co/iAPXAmMamk
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) January 25, 2021
So, it is possible that WIV & EcoH stopped in TG between 07-Apr-12 & 11-Apr-12 when moving from Yuanjiang to Mengla. In those days the miners started "re-cleaning" the mineshaft. I guess that "1st day in mine" & "1st symptoms" dates are approx.https://t.co/Ea9rqNzZYX
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) September 3, 2020