The US peoples could create an organization that issues a RENT token that is nominally worth 1 USD each of debt as a kind of bond to every homeowner so there is no excuse and you will not be making other people homeless.

The government can do this kind of thing very easily and in fact, every government is doing this, but if your government won't and you have the tech and the social climate to pull this off without being assassinated then you should do it because it would work.
Social debt can be redeemed by anyone, anytime. The origination mechanism of a token tells the story of whether it will be redeemed by society in an entirely volunteer fashion.
If a RENT token exists, you know that it was created by people to avoid other people being evicted. Then you can choose to honor it if (i) you can (iia) you think rent is legitimate or (iib) you think it's strategic to help pretend rent is legitimate (iii) you believe the issuer
Democratic, bottom-up currency creation is a technology that we must hand to people. It must be trivial to create tokens, and we must learn the power of volunteering *towards currencies*. This is an entire social language that's going to emerge.
The usability of cryptocurrency is absolutely fundamental. Client security is not that important. Token loss is unimportant. Fully mobile wallets will be it.
That is the discipline that will make cryptocurrency "mainstream":

- Democratic, bottom-up cryptocurrency creation. It already is easy to do this. I will make it trivialer with some tutorials.

- Value is *volunteered in*, not expected.

- Wallets contain *small money*. Loss=IDC
If you have large amounts of crypto-money, then you change the methodology. You transfer most funds to cold wallets, hardware wallets, etc. Most people aren't financiers. Banks exist. No need to reinvent that stuff. Everyone is already working to make crypto usable to the "rich."
With fully mobile wallets, the UX slider goes to the max. Mobile crypto wallets are garbage because you can lose the phone. They are garbage *because* they are mobile. Your "proper" crypto stuff belongs to a home desktop that you *can't* lug around.
However, it's entirely fine to lose wallet money in the original wallet sense, like a physical wallet in your pocket. The kind of money you carry in your actual physical pocket wallet is the kind of money that is OK to lug around in a mobile phone crypto wallet.
Many people are going to YOLO and just use the mobile wallet as their crypto wallet for everything, and some people will lose the backup words etc. or fumble them. That's OK.
Which blockchain stack? Doesn't matter. They are all equivalent for token issuance or operation, more or less. Just don't use stock Ethereum for this, add a side-chain or something. Or use EOSIO, or something else.
But if you want identity (i.e. democratic issuance, a la UBI) you need a solid identity oracle and identity solution.
Tokens are the communities of their "users" (the people who recognize and support the stories behind the creation and operation of such tokens/moneys/currencies/bonds/titles/rights). Communities can be tokenized.
If you have a community that wants to create a social security mechanism, a mutual social security system, one of the several ways you can do that is issue a crypto UBI *token* that represents that mutual social security, and let people redeem (fund) it at will

(cc: @HelderUBI)

More from Fabiana Cecin 🏴 🌹

But you see you don't actually understand how lawmaking works there's this set of procedures and dates that BLEAAAARGHHHHHvomitvomit


Neoliberalism is an economic genocidal ideology predicated on maintaining capitalism, and capitalism is the impoverishment, oppression and death of poor people because that's the OBJECTIVE of capitalist ideology. It's a malthusian ideology.

Neoliberals are the original Alt-Right

Capitalism has ZERO todo with "markets vs. no markets," or "central planning vs. decentralization." That's *propaganda*. That's a diversion.

Capitalism is the NAME OF THE ABSENCE of any support for poor people. In capitalism, giving ANY power to poor people is a CRIME.

Capitalism has an *exception* to the strict forbiddance of giving any economic power to the 99%, and that is the concept of "Merit."

If you act as a SLAVE (wage slave), then you can get some crumbs to *temporarily* avoid your death. While you are mechanically useful.

These fucking Neoliberals which are 99% of the Democratic Party in the US are all POSING as nice people. They are not. They are all sociopaths.

This economic fascism is so thoroughly normalized in the US that nobody has a concept of what capitalism is.

More from Society

This is a piece I've been thinking about for a long time. One of the most dominant policy ideas in Washington is that policy should, always and everywhere, move parents into paid labor. But what if that's wrong?

My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.

But what if that wasn't true?

Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.

The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!

I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.

You May Also Like