Quick thoughts and thread on the recent barrage of articles seeking to push the view that all of Israel, and the West Bank, and Jerusalem and Gaza are “apartheid”...implications of this is to roll it out on eve of Biden admin to try to shift narrative (again)

First of all the whole “Zionism is racism” and “Israel is apartheid” has been a talking point for decades pushed first by the “anti-imperialist” crowd and then later in the 1990s after end of Cold War and end of actual apartheid in S. Africa.
Second this argument has shifted from seeking to encourage Israel to leave the “Occupied Palestinian Territories” which means Gaza and West Bank and East Jerusalem; to arguing all of Israel is “apartheid”
Essentially this seeks to re-write the partition plan that the colonial power and UN put in place in 1940s and the resulting armistice lines of 1948; shoehorning Israel and the Palestinians into One State, which neither communities actually want.
The goal of this paradigm is to move from trying to encourage Israel to withdraw, making it IMPOSSIBLE for Israel to withdraw because even if Israel does...the next goal will be to dismantle the rest of Israel as an “apartheid” state inside the Green Line
We know this because of the forcible inclusion of Gaza, which Israel withdrew from in 2005. Despite leaving Israel is still called the “occupying power” because it controls the airspace and several borders (Egypt controls the fourth)
It’s interesting how even though Israel withdrew it is called “occupying” Gaza even though when Egypt withdrew in 1967 it isn’t said to be still “occupying”...Israel is the only country treated this way in the world.
Notice for instance that Ankara’s treatment of Kurds and occupation of Afrin doesn’t receive a barrage of claims it is “apartheid” even though it’s essential discrimination and national ethos has commonalities with Israel’s policies and nationalist origins .
So the goal here is to present Israel with a clear message: Even if Israel withdraws, as in Gaza, it is still “apartheid” (even though Hamas runs Gaza like an actual apartheid state denying Jewish minorities access)...so if Israel leaves the West Bank it still be “occupying”
Let me pause and provide my expertise on this issue: 10 years covering this region and Israel-Palestinian issues; and five years teaching at Palestinian Al-Quds University as an assistant professor where I heard a lot from students and faculty on their daily life.
In essence the goal of the recent articles is to argue that Israel can never end the “occupation”, even if it wants to. This is about making the nature of Israel, a nationalist state of the Jewish people, “apartheid” in essence.
Now...no other state is subjected to this definition, not Pakistan or Malaysia or other countries that put one group above another in the law; and dozens of countries do that. Only Israel is said to be “apartheid” in this logic.
The end goal here is to force Israel to be seen as one state. No reward for negotiating or leaving, as in Gaza. If Israel leaves it will always be said to “occupy”. The result is to torpedo any possible negotiations.
The reality of course is that Israel is not occupying Gaza, Gaza is it’s own entity like other non-state self-governing entities in the world (lots in the Caucasus); and the West Bank is a state-in-the-making where PA is recognized as a state by 100+ countries
At its very least the West Bank is an autonomous region, an imperfect one, but a functioning autonomous region, and there are others like it globally. Imperfect these complexities are, but the world is not perfect and many anomalies exist
From North Cyprus to Somaliland to the Kurdistan Region or Abkhazia you have many examples of powerful substate entities...and that’s ok, the post colonial and post Cold War world left many complexities. Shoehorning them into “apartheid” is just a talking point.
The tragedy of all this is that few Palestinians get to have their articles published on this issue, it’s dominated by westerners telling Palestinians what they want; there is no evidence Gazans and Israelis want one state. At the very least they should be heard from.
There is a tiny group of pro-one state activists and profiteers, in general no one wants one state who actually lives on the land. They don’t want discrimination either. They are in an imperfect and complex reality.
The essential fallacy of the apartheid argument is that apartheid South Africa came into being as one state (with its complex British and colonial era origins as multiple entities), whereas Israel has no pretense of wanting to annex Gaza or the West Bank.
Control of an area for 50 years doesn’t necessarily make it part of the larger state, for instance the same voices don’t make this argument about Morocco...or I guess about South Ossetia or other examples.
This is an artificial argument made about Israel, especially with regards to trying to force Gaza to be under Israeli rule...everyone knows Israel will NEVER administer Gaza again. It’s like the “vaccine” argument suddenly trying to make Israel responsible for Gaza health care
This rewriting history, when Israel was for many decades asked to leave Gaza and is now being shoehorned back with it...it illustrates that part of the Oslo narrative was a scam, some never wanted two states because they knew the only way to dismantle Israel’s ethos is one state
The mistaken logic of forcing the “apartheid” concept on all of Israel is that while in South Africa in the 1990s the ruling regime was convinced to dismantle itself in a post-Cold War era of democratization pushed by the West, things are different now.
Israel’s government and its national institutions, supported by a huge majority of the people inside the Green Line...are not rushing to create some experiment of the sort like Yugoslavia back in the day. They saw what happens to such shoehorned states of different groups
Israelis and Palestinians may differ on many things, but they are generally united on NOT wanting to be ruled by the same government. They worked hard to be separate in Gaza and the WB; no foreign authority is going to force them back together again.

More from World

You May Also Like

"I really want to break into Product Management"

make products.

"If only someone would tell me how I can get a startup to notice me."

Make Products.

"I guess it's impossible and I'll never break into the industry."

MAKE PRODUCTS.

Courtesy of @edbrisson's wonderful thread on breaking into comics –
https://t.co/TgNblNSCBj – here is why the same applies to Product Management, too.


There is no better way of learning the craft of product, or proving your potential to employers, than just doing it.

You do not need anybody's permission. We don't have diplomas, nor doctorates. We can barely agree on a single standard of what a Product Manager is supposed to do.

But – there is at least one blindingly obvious industry consensus – a Product Manager makes Products.

And they don't need to be kept at the exact right temperature, given endless resource, or carefully protected in order to do this.

They find their own way.
Department List of UCAS-China PROFESSORs for ANSO, CSC and UCAS (fully or partial) Scholarship Acceptance
1) UCAS School of physical sciences Professor
https://t.co/9X8OheIvRw
2) UCAS School of mathematical sciences Professor

3) UCAS School of nuclear sciences and technology
https://t.co/nQH8JnewcJ
4) UCAS School of astronomy and space sciences
https://t.co/7Ikc6CuKHZ
5) UCAS School of engineering

6) Geotechnical Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/jBCJW7UKlQ
7) Multi-scale Mechanics Teaching and Research Section
https://t.co/eqfQnX1LEQ
😎 Microgravity Science Teaching and Research

9) High temperature gas dynamics teaching and research section
https://t.co/tVIdKgTPl3
10) Department of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering
https://t.co/ubW4xhZY2R
11) Ocean Engineering Teaching and Research

12) Department of Dynamics and Advanced Manufacturing
https://t.co/42BKXEugGv
13) Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/pZdUXFTvw3
14) Power Machinery and Engineering Teaching and Research
The first ever world map was sketched thousands of years ago by Indian saint
“Ramanujacharya” who simply translated the following verse from Mahabharat and gave the world its real face

In Mahabharat,it is described how 'Maharishi Ved Vyasa' gave away his divine vision to Sanjay


Dhritarashtra's charioteer so that he could describe him the events of the upcoming war.

But, even before questions of war could begin, Dhritarashtra asked him to describe how the world looks like from space.

This is how he described the face of the world:

सुदर्शनं प्रवक्ष्यामि द्वीपं तु कुरुनन्दन। परिमण्डलो महाराज द्वीपोऽसौ चक्रसंस्थितः॥
यथा हि पुरुषः पश्येदादर्शे मुखमात्मनः। एवं सुदर्शनद्वीपो दृश्यते चन्द्रमण्डले॥ द्विरंशे पिप्पलस्तत्र द्विरंशे च शशो महान्।

—वेद व्यास, भीष्म पर्व, महाभारत


Meaning:-

हे कुरुनन्दन ! सुदर्शन नामक यह द्वीप चक्र की भाँति गोलाकार स्थित है, जैसे पुरुष दर्पण में अपना मुख देखता है, उसी प्रकार यह द्वीप चन्द्रमण्डल में दिखायी देता है। इसके दो अंशो मे पीपल और दो अंशो मे विशाल शश (खरगोश) दिखायी देता है।


Meaning: "Just like a man sees his face in the mirror, so does the Earth appears in the Universe. In the first part you see leaves of the Peepal Tree, and in the next part you see a Rabbit."

Based on this shloka, Saint Ramanujacharya sketched out the map, but the world laughed
🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖

Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W


Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela


The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.


One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.


Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"