BC WEBDEVCHEATSHEET
Saved by @cur105ity

Being developers, we work with many different languages.

Which makes it humanly impossible to remember all its aspects.
This is when a "Cheat Sheet" comes super-handy.

Here's the ultimate list of Cheatsheets for Web Developers👇🏻↓

 In this post, we'll go through some quick and useful cheat sheets that'll save you hours of wasted time each week.

When it comes to Web development, HTML is the first choice. Web development generally comprises 3 fundamentals: basically HTML, CSS, and JAVASCRIPT.
📌 HTML Cheat Sheet

Looking for a cheat sheet that contains useful code examples and web developer tools, markup generators, and more? Well, you’re going to love this.

It covers all the basic syntax along with proper examples.

🔗 https://t.co/VwnLHVT8BV
📌 HTML Reference

If you believe in learning by examples: Let me tell you about this one.

It is a free guide to HTML. You will find all the elements and attributes with proper examples for a better understanding.

🔗 https://t.co/I9ldkR5qT6
📌 CSS Reference

As we know CSS has a number of properties.
Do you remember them all? I guess nobody does. So what’s the hack? These cheat sheets are a hack.

🔗 https://t.co/3ohDkiC1ir
📌 CSS Cheat Sheet

CSS Cheat Sheet contains the most common style snippets: CSS gradient, background, button, font family, border, radius, box, text-shadow generators, color picker, and more.

🔗 https://t.co/sUE9Za1bHA
📌 GRID

Learn all about the properties available in the Grid Layout through simple visual examples. I as a developer use this handy cheat sheet all the time.

🔗 https://t.co/1ws4qycjVo
📌 FLEX

Learn all about the properties available in flexbox through simple visual examples.

You need to fix the alignment of your webpage but you don’t know which property would work? Take a look at these cheat sheets.

🔗 https://t.co/VlP2lCisRP
📌 JavaScript Cheatsheet

This 13-page cheat sheet will take you from a beginner to advanced on the fundamentals of JavaScript.

Giving you proper terminologies, and syntax of common constructs.

🔗 https://t.co/Y6BZqRGRBO
📌 JavaScript (JS) Cheat Sheet

This JavaScript cheat sheet comes with the most important concepts, functions, methods, and more.

A complete quick reference for beginners.

🔗 https://t.co/EmTVYHaKdN
📌 Modern-JS-cheatsheet

This document is a cheat sheet for JavaScript containing tips, tricks, and best practices you will frequently encounter in modern projects and most contemporary sample code.

🔗 https://t.co/kNAXJtJB0S
📌 React.js cheatsheet

Looking for a quick reference to React.js? Have a look at this cheat sheet.
This guide targets React v15 to v16.

🔗 https://t.co/UVdqyV8r2l
📌 https://t.co/QuRNFAizEj

Cheatography has thousands of incredible, original programming cheat sheets. You will find everything related to a particular programming language and can easily download them.

🔗 https://t.co/uw2tQ4CIdR
📌 https://t.co/7lFOd89iIH

This website aggregates cheat sheets for many popular programming languages such as JavaScript, NodeJS, PHP, Python, and CSS.

🔗 https://t.co/sPrPoS3YMU
📌 Developer Cheat Sheets

This cheat sheet is a compilation of some of the most popular languages: The history of web development, React cheat sheet, React Router cheat sheet, Redux cheat sheet, ES6 cheat sheet, and Request cheat sheet.

🔗 https://t.co/tALjaVBCey
There are literally hundreds of resources out there, and I hope that some of the ones listed here will prove to be useful in your day-to-day work — and most importantly help you avoid some time-consuming, routine tasks.

Happy coding! 🙌🏻
That's a wrap! 🙌🏻🔥

If you enjoyed this thread:

1. Follow me @Insharamin for more of these
2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience https://t.co/Ef7sL76oMk

You May Also Like

Dr Naomi Wolf
Dr Naomi Wolf
@naomirwolf
1/Just had an interview scheduled with @goddeketal, Dr Simon Goddek, the post-doctoral researcher at the Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics in the field of biotechnology, at an unnamed Dutch university. This researcher has been publicly pointing out that the paper that...

2/ the PCR test as the gold standard underlying global "lockdowns" was passed after maximum ONE day of peer review, as opposed to the average at that same journal of 172 days in 2019. Also that several authors have conflicts of interest. Unfortunately we were forced to cancel..

3/ because he was strongly advised by his university to maintain silence and not speak publicly -- to step back from this issue. I learned from a source that his university was heavily assailed by many complaints. Other scientists who have signed the review criticizing the PRC..

4/test, the "Retraction Request Letter", a critique that got worldwide attention, have also been bombarded with attacks, their relatives are being called at night, and their universities assailed. Some are at risk of losing jobs. Even former employers are being harassed. I..

5/ Note : scientists around the world are being silenced and harassed if they speak up in normal criticism of the scientific methods or conclusions used to advance the lockdown agenda and COVID testing. This is not post-enlightenment scientific discourse, this is how scientists
SCIENCE
Erik Torenberg
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.

Please add your own.

2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you


3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.

“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”

“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”

4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:

“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”

“What’s end-game here?”

“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”

5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:

“What would the best version of yourself do”?
LIFE
Advertisement
John Myles White
John Myles White
@johnmyleswhite
This post is pretty bizarre, but it manages to hit on so many false beliefs that I've seen hurt junior data scientists that it deserves some explicit

(1) The notion that R is well-suited to "building web applications" seems totally out of left field. I don't feel like most R loyalists think this is a good idea, but it's worth calling out that no normal company will be glad you wrote your entire web app in R.

(2) It is true that Python had some issues historically with the 2-to-3 transition, but it's not such a big deal these days. On the flip side, I have found interesting R code that doesn't run in modern R interpreters because of changes in core operations (e.g. assignment syntax).

(3) "Most of the time we only need a latest, working interpreter with the latest packages to run the code" -- this is where things get real and reveal some things that hurt data scientists. If this sentence is true, it's likely because you don't share code with coworkers.

(3) Really is a broader issue in data science: people only think of what they need to do their work if no one else existed and code was never maintained. Junior data scientists almost always operate on projects they start from scratch and don't have to maintain for long.
DATA SCIENCE
Roger Grosse
Roger Grosse
@RogerGrosse
Important paper from Google on large batch optimization. They do impressively careful experiments measuring # iterations needed to achieve target validation error at various batch sizes. The main "surprise" is the lack of surprises. [thread]

https://t.co/7QIx5CFdfJ


The paper is a good example of lots of elements of good experimental design. They validate their metric by showing lots of variants give consistent results. They tune hyperparamters separately for each condition, check that optimum isn't at the endpoints, and measure sensitivity.

They have separate experiments where the hold fixed # iterations and # epochs, which (as they explain) measure very different things. They avoid confounds, such as batch norm's artificial dependence between batch size and regularization strength.

When the experiments are done carefully enough, the results are remarkably consistent between different datasets and architectures. Qualitatively, MNIST behaves just like ImageNet.

Importantly, they don't find any evidence for a "sharp/flat optima" effect whereby better optimization leads to worse final results. They have a good discussion of experimental artifacts/confounds in past papers where such effects were reported.
MACHINE LEARNING
Conviction | Patience
Conviction | Patience
@unseenvalue
H was always unseen in S2NL :)

Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.

Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
UVLEARNINGS