The media issue a scathing, well-documented look at how much money US Catholic dioceses raked in under Trump's pandemic relief initiative, and watch the response in Catholic circles, Catholic media, among many Catholic laity. /1

It's a variant of the VERY SAME response used repeatedly by Catholic leaders to exonerate top-level responsibility for priests abusing minors and going unpunished.

The typical gambit now being used to justify the lavish feeding at the Trump trough: /2
Well, maybe dioceses were grabby and did not need all that money — look at the assets they're sitting on already — but poor, struggling parishes needed that money.

As if a parish is somehow disconnected from a diocese …. As if a parish is not integrally tied to a diocese. /3
As I say, this is a variant of the argument often advanced by Catholic leaders to justify doing nothing when a priest is known to be abusing minors: Well, he's only a hired employee on a contract. What does he have to do with us, with the bishop, with the chancellor? /4
The whole Catholic governing system is set up in a way that totally integrates parishes with dioceses. No parish and no parish priest can possibly function with independence from diocesan structures. Let a parish/parish priest try that, and see how quick the reprisal is. /5
But now we're being told by defensive Catholic apologists who want us to stop seeing the damning evidence of that media report about how much money dioceses raked in under Trump's program that while dioceses may have been greedy, parishes, poor little things, were needy. /6
They did good things with the money.

While the dioceses of which they are an integral part were raking in huge sums as they sat on huge assets: in what sense is any parish needy, given these facts? /7
These are peculiar arguments, are they not, for an institution whose ecclesiology is deeply corporatist: We're one body, the body of Christ. The hand cannot work independently from the foot or the heart…. /8
Except when it suddenly becomes expedient to pretend we're not one body at all, that a parish somehow functions independently of a diocese and that the diocese, with its abundant assets, cannot assist a parish in financial need…. /9
As if greed at the diocesan level says nothing at all about the rest of the Catholic structure — and as if lay Catholics and their parishes are in no way implicated in greed at the diocesan level, or cover-up of priests' abuse at the diocesan level…. /10
You know what it behooves Catholics to do if they want a better, less corrupt, more authentic church?

Face the truth for a change. Tell the truth for a change. Stop letting Catholic media play both-sides games with the truth for a change. If you really *want* a better church./11

More from Trump

You May Also Like

Rig Ved 1.36.7

To do a Namaskaar or bow before someone means that you are humble or without pride and ego. This means that we politely bow before you since you are better than me. Pranipaat(प्राणीपात) also means the same that we respect you without any vanity.

1/9


Surrendering False pride is Namaskaar. Even in devotion or bhakti we say the same thing. We want to convey to Ishwar that we have nothing to offer but we leave all our pride and offer you ourselves without any pride in our body. You destroy all our evil karma.

2/9

We bow before you so that you assimilate us and make us that capable. Destruction of our evils and surrender is Namaskaar. Therefore we pray same thing before and after any big rituals.

3/9

तं घे॑मि॒त्था न॑म॒स्विन॒ उप॑ स्व॒राज॑मासते ।
होत्रा॑भिर॒ग्निं मनु॑षः॒ समिं॑धते तिति॒र्वांसो॒ अति॒ स्रिधः॑॥

Translation :

नमस्विनः - To bow.

स्वराजम् - Self illuminating.

तम् - His.

घ ईम् - Yours.

इत्था - This way.

उप - Upaasana.

आसते - To do.

स्त्रिधः - For enemies.

4/9

अति तितिर्वांसः - To defeat fast.

मनुषः - Yajman.

होत्राभिः - In seven numbers.

अग्निम् - Agnidev.

समिन्धते - Illuminated on all sides.

Explanation : Yajmans bow(do Namaskaar) before self illuminating Agnidev by making the offerings of Havi.

5/9