The typical gambit now being used to justify the lavish feeding at the Trump trough: /2
The media issue a scathing, well-documented look at how much money US Catholic dioceses raked in under Trump's pandemic relief initiative, and watch the response in Catholic circles, Catholic media, among many Catholic laity. /1
The typical gambit now being used to justify the lavish feeding at the Trump trough: /2
As if a parish is somehow disconnected from a diocese …. As if a parish is not integrally tied to a diocese. /3
While the dioceses of which they are an integral part were raking in huge sums as they sat on huge assets: in what sense is any parish needy, given these facts? /7
More from Trump
TS = 4:40 pm
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2020
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
You May Also Like
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
One of the oddest features of the Labour tax row is how raising allowances, which the media allowed the LDs to describe as progressive (in spite of evidence to contrary) through the coalition years, is now seen by everyone as very right wing
— Tom Clark (@prospect_clark) November 2, 2018
Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel
He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:
He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:
He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.