ISIS do think they represent Islam, so according to the earlier said argument, ISIS are Islamophobes.
I've heard the claim "ISIS don't represent real Islam and anyone who thinks they do is an islamophobe" more times than I remember. So, I decided to write down why that statement really doesn't stop people from wanting to cut off Muslims socially and economically.
ISIS do think they represent Islam, so according to the earlier said argument, ISIS are Islamophobes.
There are other Muslims who support above said groups and governments. They're also now Islamophobes.
Now, think about this.
There are millions of Muslims who have a favourable view of groups like ISIS, or don't show any unfavourable opinion openly.
That leaves us with an important question :
As I said earlier, Ben Shapiro, in his video, proves than the majority of Muslims are radicalized according to a pew study.
Premise 1. Most Muslims have a radical point of view about Islam
Premise 2. Only Islamophobes have a radical point of view about Islam
Conclusion : therefore, most Muslims are Islamophobes.
Now we have to wonder.
Another thing. This also means that any "muslim" who meet in your life have an above 50% chance of being an islamophobe.
As you see, if you think that ISIS represent Islam, you have to stay away from all Muslims, for your own safety.
If you think that ISIS don't represent Islam and anyone who thinks they do is an islamophobe, you have to stay away from all Muslims for your own safety.
Yet another classic case of leftist dilemma, my friends.
However, it's not over yet. What about all the seemingly controversial material we find in the Islamic texts?
Now, let's put aside the quran for a while, even though we find such material there too. Let's look at the hadith for now.
Hadith basically go like this.
Now, here's the thing. Many of these hadiths state that Muhammad did some very, very problematic things.
If the greatest muslim who ever lived was an islamophobe, then there are no Muslims in the world today, and thus Islam is a goner.
Then there's another problem. Why didn't Muslims have a problem with these early Islamophobes?
Let's say that Muhammad was a muslim and that person D in the above said narration was an islamophobe.
Going by this, we can't consider G or F or E to be the Islamophobe. So, let's assume he was D.
Now we have to wonder. Why didn't Muslims have any problem with any of those early Islamophobes, even the ones within their own community?
Putting all of this together, I'd say that the new premise doesn't help Muslims at all.
Notice that I didn't even go into the quran interpretations, Muhammad's life story texts, or history of Islam etc etc. Believe me, it gets a lot worse if I do that.
You May Also Like
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?