#tatapower complex head and shoulders pattern, can breakout. SL will be tight.
#nifty #SwingTrading
More from Logical Trader
ICICI bank, the juggernaut continues. Picked it up around 680, now 800. https://t.co/eZLWVR8BVO
#ICICIBank chart update. One sided rally last few weeks.
ICICI Bank#ICICIBANK
— Shreenidhi P (@nid_rockz) July 23, 2022
Good performance continues yet again
Strong Q1FY23
PPOP\u2b06\ufe0f19% at 10273cr
NII\u2b06\ufe0f21%
PAT\u2b06\ufe0f50% at 6905cr
CASA 48.5%
Domestic loan pf\u2b06\ufe0f22%
GNPA 3.4% vs 3.6% QoQ
NNPA at 0.7% vs 0.76% QoQ
PCR 79.6%
Consolidated:
PAT 7384cr vs 4763cr
Q4 PAT at 7719cr pic.twitter.com/37CANjYsMH
#ICICIBank chart update. One sided rally last few weeks.
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
