🎙🔛 @Pirlo_official talks #NapoliJuve from 13:00 CET ⏰

🔴🖥 WATCH LIVE on @JuventusTV!

🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "This will be an important match for both teams. #NapoliJuve is always a great match and there are important points at stake."
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "@arthurhromelo will be evaluated day by day, and we hope everything passes by quickly. @PauDybala_JR is continuing his recovery plan, it will depend on how he feels in the next few days."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "@bonucci_leo19 is a bit tired and will train with us today, then we will evaluate whether to bring him to Naples. The same goes for @aaronramsey."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "We will look at who we have in front of us and think only of ourselves and our journey. Our only goal is to win and do well."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "We are focused on what we have to do, we are recovering well after the match against Inter and this is the only thing we have on our mind."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "Since the Super Cup, we have embarked on a growth path... From there, the team has raised the level, understood the mistakes and a more convincing journey has begun. We needed time, and these positive results have allowed us to work better."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "We faced Roma and Inter in a different way by our choice, but it doesn't mean that we will always
play like this. These are my choices based on the opponent, but the approach remains the same: command the game and press high."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "The Scudetto? More than 80 points will certainly be needed, but compared to other years, I think it has dropped a bit due to the many competitions and the general level of the league."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "@WMckennie is doing pretty well. The other night he was not at 100% and we will also evaluate him today because he had a problem with his hip. We'll see who is in better shape and decide how to play."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "@AlvaroMorata is better, he has trained these two days. He could play from the start or come off the bench, in light of our #UCL commitment."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "#Bentancur had the opportunity to shoot against Inter, but he preferred the pass. We are trying to work on this too, he is doing very well."

#NapoliJuve
🎙️ @Pirlo_official: "Upfront, two will play and one will be on the bench. In the last few matches I had asked #Kulusevski to work on the defensive side of things and he did it very well. We are happy."

#NapoliJuve
That was @Pirlo_official's final response.

The recap of his virtual press conference will be up soon!

#NapoliJuve

More from Sport

You May Also Like

1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?