Amazing what is going on with narratives that justify ever more draconian policies.

1. Lockdowns China did would never be acceptable in a democracy.
2. Covid is really scary and we don’t know how badly it affects people. Maybe the chinese knows something we don’t. Let’s err on the side of caution.
3. It doesn’t seem to impact kids as much, and the figures show shielded protection is viable - but we need to protect against LONG covid. 4. The first wave outbreak seems not to be matched by same scale of excess deaths as second wave. But mutant strain now about!
5. We don’t know if mutant strain will be treatable with vaccines or if it will impact children - better to err on side of caution and shut everything down again. 6. Data suggests hospitals are within winter crisis norms - but these are not the data points you are looking for.
7. The data points you are looking for are anecdotal testimonies from mostly anonymous NHS staff as well as new regimes and protocol constraints which make all the previous data null and void.
8. We can’t possibly boost carer numbers with retired personnel as they haven’t done the right health, safety and diversity training. 9. Neil Ferguson can see his girlfriend on assumption of immunity, but Lockdown applies to everyone regardless of whether they had it or not.
10. Antibody tests were going to be game changing and allow a big portion of people back to work force- but now whether you have had it or not won’t make a difference as you can still spread it!
11. We won’t be able to stop wearing masks or social distancing even after every vulnerable person is vaccinated because the vaccinated can still spread it to the vulnerable but impossible to vaccinate. 12. Yet airlines won’t let you on unless u have been vaccinated regardless!
That last point is particularly grating! If you can still spread despite vaccination and natural immunity WHAT IS THE POINT of a vaccine certificate passport??
PS sorry for typos and literals. Fingers can’t keep up with thoughts.

More from Society

Brief thread to debunk the repeated claims we hear about transmission not happening 'within school walls', infection in school children being 'a reflection of infection from the community', and 'primary school children less likely to get infected and contribute to transmission'.

I've heard a lot of scientists claim these three - including most recently the chief advisor to the CDC, where the claim that most transmission doesn't happen within the walls of schools. There is strong evidence to rebut this claim. Let's look at


Let's look at the trends of infection in different age groups in England first- as reported by the ONS. Being a random survey of infection in the community, this doesn't suffer from the biases of symptom-based testing, particularly important in children who are often asymptomatic

A few things to note:
1. The infection rates among primary & secondary school children closely follow school openings, closures & levels of attendance. E.g. We see a dip in infections following Oct half-term, followed by a rise after school reopening.


We see steep drops in both primary & secondary school groups after end of term (18th December), but these drops plateau out in primary school children, where attendance has been >20% after re-opening in January (by contrast with 2ndary schools where this is ~5%).

You May Also Like