BC SOCIETY
Saved by @CodyyyGardner

Bear with me here for a moment.

There are acceptable "censorships" and censorships which you should stand up against - because sooner or later the latter will bite you in the ass too.

 So, on the top of the acceptable so called "censorship" - it's basically platforms and media moderating content published there. It is better when they have their own criteria, more conservative than the legal framework, in order to keep content in line with their goals/agendas.
Under this fall, e. g., news portals moderating comments under their articles and hand-picking their staff and guest authors who are being published on it.

It also applies to fringe portals; Breitbart has a full authority to censor me if I go nuts and decide to comment there.
I will mention here free market for the first time. Free market provides and private media (unlike one owned by the state) are not expected to be unbiased. There are obviously issues with that too, but it's less of a problem than not having them like that.
So, you get it. You run a platform where you publish your content and you want to try and benefit from your consumers' engagement. Please, by all means, do moderate it. I don't care where you are on the political or social spectrum - moderate the hell out of it.
In the same category, on top of it together with media outlets, are *independent* forums or all kinds - whether independent web forums run by one soul in mother's basement or niche groups.
For example, I don't want to hang out on keyboard users forums if political topics there are not at least isolated, if not overall banned. I also don't need mechanical keyboards users discussing global warming or promoting anti-vaccine agendas there.
So, these need to moderate their content, for legal and reasons which are factoring in their ability to survive on the market. It's equivalent of you being able to decide what happens in your own living room.
Arguably in the same category, but on the slightly more slippery slope, are mashup advertising/media outlets which don't produce their content at all but rely on 3rd parties to generate it and engage around it. Those are all of your mainstream "social networks".
Quote marks there because there is little social about it. Widespread acceptance of Facebook and even Twitter made them in turn "social", but they are shops where you are the product. You need to always understand that. They own content. They own this rant of mine.
So, I've been wrong before, but I don't see an issue of them also moderating the content on their platform, in any direction. As we've seen in the last decade, they *will not* moderate content for your sake, but for the sake of their advertisers.
Advertisers, in turn, are more or less picky on where they advertise, based on the input from their own customers. It's kind of the "free market provides" thing. And while today you might agree with the direction of it, tomorrow you might not (or vice versa).
But it doesn't change the fact that they have absolute right to moderate their platforms. If you like that concept now, just remember to not cry "tomorrow" when it comes up to, as I've already said, bite you on your ass.
These platforms are not here for you, they are here to serve current market trends. Market trends were fuelling the political moderation last 4 years - it wasn't opportunistic to ban Trump and his terror org here until it finally made a full move.
Market didn't care if deplorables planned it here whole time. Twitter, Facebook and the rest of the gang did not start banning the actors of the terror org just because they crossed the final red line.
They banned them because they've shoot themselves in the leg and crossed lines acceptable to the - market.

You may not like their motivation, but you might like the outcome. I can tell you outright that if you're in that group - you need to rethink your position.
But overall, Twitter, Facebook, et. al., have the full right to ban Trump and his terror org. But also, tomorrow they have full right to ban you; or me or anyone else for that matter.

They are *still* only market entities and not essential service.
GOP-sphere is having a meltdown over terror org members being banned here, but Chinese and Iranian state and state sponsored players not. They are kinda right, but they don't understand - free market right now cares about eradicating the Trump terror org.
So to cut this short, although I could likely write a novel on why you need to follow the principles when you cheer or scream against moderation of the platforms - this category of outlets/platforms has full right to moderate their content.
If they overdo it, advertisers will leave. If they fail to do it, advertisers will leave. Both takes time to happen, but it does in the end happen.
And then we come to who should not moderate the content.

People smarter than me warned against Apple App Store ban on sexual content since the day 0 of App Store. And they are right.

Similarly, people complaining about Apple and Google banning Parler are equally right.
The thing is that right now mobile (and still less but also increasingly desktop) platforms are walled gardens.
You can (esp. on Android) side-load apps not available on app store, but you probably don't want to do it on the device on which you have, e.g., your personal banking app. You definitely don't want to jailbreak your main day-to-day device.
There is a reason why most of the companies will require you to not do those things on the devices they provide to you, and try to detect you doing so through mobile device management frameworks. You *should* treat your personal infosec like your employer does its own.
Platforms of this kind, of course, have right but also legal obligations to moderate what runs on their platforms. But their rules should *not* be more restrictive than local judiciaries.
To be precise: they should be able to ban apps failing to moderate on their own revenge porn. But there is no real reason why they would be expected to ban distribution of apps which are sexual in nature but moderate well and keep their users safe.
Of course, Apple can not be expected to be a judge whether some app with sexual content is a safe place for sex workers or rapists publish videos of abusing their victims there. They should, though, act when someone comes with court approved legal ban on something.
I do appreciate that banning sex on the app store seems like a no-brainer for many people, but you need to understand that unreasonable moderation on the levels where it should not happen starts there.
App stores should allow you to find official Pornhub app, if Pornhub decides to make one. They should not be gatekeepers of moral standards, because you should be able to run "immoral content" on *your device* without putting yourself to security risk.
I find it disturbing that app store will ban some apps, but then traces of absolutely inappropriate content will leak through ads in the "free" apps financed by commercials all over the place. It's a clear example of failure of a "big tech will keep us safe" model.
Specifically on Parler. I fuckin' hate that it exists, as a safe heaven for the members of the terror organisation. I want many people from there to be investigated, and if needed arrested and trialed for terrorism. TBH, I want to believe majority even there is not that.
Also, practically banning them from app stores is not *such* a big deal because in the end it's just a web app. You know, users can still use it from their mobile and desktop browsers.

But that's not the point.
The point is that until yesterday vast number of small apps which don't really function as plain web sites were facing obstacles or were even banned from app stores based on some imaginary way of reading their own rules (everybody here at least remembers Hey thing?).
And it will continue happening tomorrow.

Apps which don't distribute porn, which have not positioned themselves in any way as political radicals platform; apps which are simply in a way of app stores monopoly over platforms.
It's not about Parler. At best tomorrow an app you like will be banned simply because it can be banned. At worst, your job and income will be on the line because these platforms banned product/service you live off.
Parler should be handled by the state of law to be forced to either change to not be a safe heaven for terrorists or shut down. It should not be prior to that banned from the platforms.
As much as I hate it - they are only a platform which I think failed to moderate their content and they are innocent until proven guilty. And their guilt can't be judged by tech giants.

Courts also fuck up, but there are ways to mend that.
That was my rant for the last nothing less than interesting week.
Summary: https://t.co/cHgijKH9bZ

More from Society

Louisette Lanteigne \U0001f30e\u270c\ufe0f\u2696\ufe0f\u2665\ufe0f
Louisette Lanteigne 🌎✌...
@lulex
Count Giancarlo Cicogna was a member of the Ciga hotels clan. He was with Ghislaine Maxwell for 4 years. He was 'the man who moulded the Ghislaine we now see. He told her where to get her hair cut, and what to wear.'
https://t.co/XorCl9VKW6


There is a very Ghislaine like character named Madam Anais in the movie La Belle De Jour who runs a Brothel. The film was produced by Marina Cicogna.


Private View of 'Once Upon Time' an Exhibition of Photographs by Marina Cicogna Sponsored by Fiat at the Little Black Gallery,

My view Marina Cicogna looks like Dottie in the Disney Channel series WandaVision.


NY Times covered a story of Countess Marina Cicogna, a woman with a very intetesting life. I am sure she knows many secrets and that gives her power over people of influence.
SOCIETY
Respectable Lawyer
Respectable Lawyer
@RespectableLaw
There's been a lot of talk about the missionary killed by the natives of North Sentinel Island. They're probably so aggressive because of this weirdo, Maurice Vidal Portman. So here's a big thread about this creep and some facts from my decade-long obsession with the island.


The Sentinelese are often described as “uncontacted,” but this not strictly true. They had a very significant contact in 1880 with Commander Portman.

Portman, the black sheep third son of some minor noble, was assigned by the English Royal Navy to administer and pacify the Andaman Islands, a job he pursued from 1880-1900 with the full measure of his own perversity.


Portman was erotically obsessed with the Andamanese, and he indulged his passion for photography by kidnapping members of various tribes and posing them in mock-Greek homoerotic compositions.


During his 20 years in a sexualized heart of darkness, Portman measured and cataloged every inch of his prisoner’s bodies, with an obsessive focus on genitals.
SOCIETY
Advertisement
Abir Ballan \U0001f60a
Abir Ballan 😊
@abirballan
I have just received information about a family that has locked up their child at home in isolation because she complained of some aches in her body. They suspected the child as having C19. She was tested and after a couple of days, the test came out negative. 1/n

The girl has already been in isolation for 4 days. Now they are waiting to do another PCR test today to check again because they fear that the first test was done too early and it didn't detect covid. So this little girl will remain in isolation for at least another 24 hrs. 2/n

This is idiocy. Insanity. Ignorance. Cruelty. Simply a crime against children.
The stupid fear and the stupid policies are driving parents to abuse their children. 3/n

Children are not the main source of C19 transmission.

"transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children under 14 years of age was minimal in primary schools"
SOCIETY
Paul Matzko
Paul Matzko
@PMatzko
Having spent 2020 telling covid denalists that they were overly optimistic about the pandemic, I now look forward to spending 2021 telling covid maximalists that they are overly pessimistic about the end of the pandemic.

Telling a denialist in May that we shouldn't open bars back up = telling a maximalist in February that we should open schools back up.

Look, folks, the math is straightforward. ~13% of Americans have been vaccinated as of this

And the 7 day average continues to rise; we're approach 2 million vaccine doses per day. Meaning that we'll double that ~13% much faster than the two months it took us to get there.


So it's entirely reasonable that absent any other intervention, we should expect to hit ~30% vaccinated by the end of March.
SOCIETY
@AdamSmithWorks
@AdamSmithWorks
@adamsmithworks
It's been a whole day since we tweeted Part 2 of this chapter, so let us remind you: #AdamSmith just said that the colonies got nothing that helped them succeed from the mother country. (IV.vii.c) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

So these two opening sentences are pretty heckin’ sarcastic:
Now we've seen the great advantages the colonies got (they got nothing!) (IV.vii.c.1)
So what have been the great advantages to Europe! (IV.vii.c.2)

Seems like there’s a...tone there. #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets


Europeans buy goods from America, and Americans buy European goods as well. Even countries that don’t trade directly with America have benefited. (IV.vii.c.3–8) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

The mother countries restrict colonial trade (esp the exclusive right to buy from or sell to their colonies). That's a dead weight on the increase of the wealth of nations. Everything is more expensive, everyone enjoys less of it. (IV.vii.c.9) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets

Maybe European countries get added security? In ancient times, empires expected military support and revenue from their colonies, and they got it.
18thC colonies? Not so much. (IV.vii.c.11–13) #WealthOfTweets #SmithTweets
SOCIETY

You May Also Like

Marc K\xf6hlbrugge
Marc Köhlbrugge
@marckohlbrugge
💬 I often get Q’s like these:

How did you get your first customers for WIP? How did you grow BetaList’s traffic? Etc.

Makers are looking to reverse-engineer success. I see it everywhere.

I don’t think it works that way and the answers to those questions are mostly useless. 💥

I have built dozens of different products over the last couple of years. The vast majority failed. 😭

Surely if I know the answers to these questions, but still fail over and over again, these answers aren’t that useful. 🤷‍♀️

So what’s a better question to ask? 🤔

99.9% of the questions I receive are about the products that did well. In a way that makes sense, because we quickly forget about those that didn’t succeed.

🧠 This is known as survivorship bias.

Focusing on what survived, while ignoring what made it survive in the first place.

The real question, what you really want to know, is this:

What makes @WIP, @BetaList, and to some extent @AllStartupJobs succeed where my countless other attempts failed?

What separates a failed product 👎 from a successful product 👍?

Honestly, I don’t know. I wish I did.

It’s like Steve Jobs said “I’ll know it when I see it.” 👀

Same is true when we make products. We don’t know upfront what will work. But once we see an inkling of a product that does have potential, it’s not that hard to spot.
STARTUPS
Kestrel \u2664 lwj kin
Kestrel ♤ lwj kin
@slutxian
MDZS is laden with buddhist references. As a South Asian person, and history buff, it is so interesting to see how Buddhism, which originated from India, migrated, flourished & changed in the context of China. Here's some research (🙏🏼 @starkjeon for CN insight + citations)

1. LWJ’s sword Bichen ‘is likely an abbreviation for the term 躲避红尘 (duǒ bì hóng chén), which can be translated as such: 躲避: shunning or hiding away from 红尘 (worldly affairs; which is a buddhist teaching.) (https://t.co/zF65W3roJe) (abbrev. TWX)

2. Sandu (三 毒), Jiang Cheng’s sword, refers to the three poisons (triviṣa) in Buddhism; desire (kāma-taṇhā), delusion (bhava-taṇhā) and hatred (vibhava-taṇhā).

These 3 poisons represent the roots of craving (tanha) and are the cause of Dukkha (suffering, pain) and thus result in rebirth.

Interesting that MXTX used this name for one of the characters who suffers, arguably, the worst of these three emotions.

3. The Qian kun purse “乾坤袋 (qián kūn dài) – can be called “Heaven and Earth” Pouch. In Buddhism, Maitreya (मैत्रेय) owns this to store items. It was believed that there was a mythical space inside the bag that could absorb the world.” (TWX)
RELIGION
Advertisement
Daoyu
Daoyu
@Daoyu15
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
ALL
Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 ...
@BillyBostickson
1/x Fort Detrick History
Mr. Patrick, one of the chief scientists at the Army Biological Warfare Laboratories at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., held five classified US patents for the process of weaponizing anthrax.

2/x
Under Mr. Patrick’s direction, scientists at Fort Detrick developed a tularemia agent that, if disseminated by airplane, could cause casualties & sickness over 1000s mi². In a 10,000 mi² range, it had 90% casualty rate & 50% fatality rate


3/x His team explored Q fever, plague, & Venezuelan equine encephalitis, testing more than 20 anthrax strains to discern most lethal variety. Fort Detrick scientists used aerosol spray systems inside fountain pens, walking sticks, light bulbs, & even in 1953 Mercury exhaust pipes


4/x After retiring in 1986, Mr. Patrick remained one of the world’s foremost specialists on biological warfare & was a consultant to the CIA, FBI, & US military. He debriefed Soviet defector Ken Alibek, the deputy chief of the Soviet biowarfare program
https://t.co/sHqSaTSqtB


5/x Back in Time
In 1949 the Army created a small team of chemists at "Camp Detrick" called Special Operations Division. Its assignment was to find military uses for toxic bacteria. The coercive use of toxins was a new field, which fascinated Allen Dulles, later head of the CIA
ALL
Pieter Levels \u2728
Pieter Levels ✨
@levelsio
Joe Rogan's podcast is now is listened to 1.5+ billion times per year at around $50-100M/year revenue.

Independent and 100% owned by Joe, no networks, no middle men and a 100M+ people audience.

👏

https://t.co/RywAiBxA3s

Joe is the #1 / #2 podcast (depends per week) of all podcasts

120 million plays per month source https://t.co/k7L1LfDdcM


https://t.co/aGcYnVDpMu
MAKERS