I am somehow now getting the the reason why all WWW based SM platforms went berserk simultaneously! Nope it has nothing to do with the election results , rather its a bigger plan a deception ! Here it goes .. its a thread
So a flu demic was planned with all complaint govts in the world (btw all govts and leaders are compliant including Modi and Trump)
So problem started when around 2008-9 SM plaforms started getting popular and became a huge means of exposing deletes and their dark deeds
These targets were -
1) Economic reshi(e)t of the world to make it more controlled with very few personal liberties to people
2) establishment of a surveillance state all across the world
But one thing that stood in the way of achievement of these targets was world wide web nature of internet and social media!
Then all 2020 drama happened !
Make no mistake , every SINGLE political party and political leader is a slave of Deletes, so is media , religious leaders and everyone else
Trump is playing as per the script given to him by the Deletes, alm his actions are targeted to keep his supporters sympathy for him alive and at the same time kill the biggest hurdle in the way of the great Reshit
This can be achieve only by destroying these companies that deletes already own !
But how to destroy them in one go without public outrage ?
Well only way to do so is to make Public against these SM platforms
They went ahead to mass delete the accounts (which works well for DeLetes)
I realized this game when i saw the tweets done by Tump from his potus account
Vocal for Local ka nara kahan se aaya samjhe ?
Deletes have kept your illusion of freedom for past 70 years , they can’t continue it any longer
More from Society
Two things can be true at once:
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause
I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.
I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views
I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.
I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause
How about Selina Todd, Kathleen Stock, Jo Phoenix, Rachel Ara, Sarah Honeychurch, Michele Moore, Nina Power, Joanna Williams, Jenny Murray, Julia Gasper ...
— Matt Goodwin (@GoodwinMJ) February 17, 2021
Or is it only Eric you pop at?
Are they all making it up too Rob?
Are they "beyond parody"? https://t.co/drQssTD0OL
I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.
I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views
I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.
I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.