Here is a synopsis of a situation outside of our place in DC Saturday night and some things to think about going forward about the limits of policing. (1/?)

So, about two hours ago, there was a man across the street from where we live screaming and threatening no one in particular on our side of the street.
It's unclear from my vantage whether the man is mentally ill or was simply intoxicated, but suffice it to say he's not in his right mind during this outburst.
In a major US city, this is not particularly unusual, though anyone in the immediate vicinity could be excused for feeling uncomfortable.

I'd imagine description would read something like: B/M, 6'0", 30s, grey hoodie, black pants, pacing & yelling in threatening manner.
For 15-20 minutes, he was totally left alone. At some point, MPD was called, and they came-- but no lights or sirens, established a very loose perimeter--and let him continue to rant at nobody in particular.
At one point, he turned toward officers who were standing 20-30 ft away, who were making themselves known but not pushing or escalating situation. That didn't stop him from antagonizing them and continuing to make aggressive gestures, but the officers weren't biting.
Knowing a handful of patrol cops on this shift in my PSA, this is very much in line with how I'd expect and hope them to react.

Even though his pockets were even bulgy from a distance and he kept putting his hands in his pockets, no officer I saw made any move for their weapon
Eventually, it appears the man tired out and walked away. The police stuck around for a few minutes but got back in their cruisers and left--no one got hurt, no one arrested (as far as what was visible from my vantage).
Whether or not you are pro- or anti-police, or somewhere in between, the undeniable facts are:

-People sometimes get out of control (OOC) and someone needs to respond to put others at ease.
-The reasons people get OOC are myriad and often point to systemic social failures.
-Right now, police are the de facto responders, but they don't HAVE to be.
-Some cops/PDs handle these situations well, while others predictably resort to unnecessary violence. Because of the latter, it's reasonable to think twice before calling for help for OOC folks.
-The defund/abolish folx recognize these issues & want to address underlying issues--specifically support for the mentally ill--that lead to temporarily OOC people.
-The cops recognize these issues too and get frustrated that they don't have tools to address underlying issues
For all the man's bluster & aggressive posturing, he never approached anyone & thus no one seemed to be in imminent danger.

So here I am, looking out my window, staring at a situation that I knew someone would call 911 to address sooner or later & hoping right cops responded.
In discrete scenarios (cf. terrible day-to-day policy decisions), this is the crux of the problem.

Societally, we're failing our most vulnerable neighbors and generally don't care until they're having breakdowns outside of our homes, when we then call armed men to end it.
The BLM/defund/abolish folks are saying this is the wrong way to handle these situations...AND THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

There is nothing anti-cop in saying & recognizing this basic truth. Sure, a few people will always get OOC, but we have a lot more OOC folks than we should
And that is because we have absolutely failed to address mental health issues in this country. In major cities, this leads to unnecessary arrests and police violence against disadvantaged. In rural areas, it leads to rising gun suicides among middle-aged white men.
So I see what happened outside my window tonight and think:
1-thank you MPD officers for not escalating an unfortunate situation
2-this is not a long-term solution for the man in question and the countless folks like him around the country.
People who paint these issues as pro-cop or anti-cop are not interested in making life better for our most vulnerable neighbors. They aren't taking into account what is going on when personal emergencies happen and what we collectively need to do to prevent unnecessary tragedies.
But it's also wrong to think that responding to mental health problems are the only issue with current policing.

Many day-to-day policing choices do nothing to improve community well-being, and the defund/abolish folks are right about that too.
So the challenge we're facing is making govts & institutions more constructively responsive to enduring problems in communities. Some require law enforcement, many do not.

But in the best scenario, cops are performing triage which leaves us with far larger problems to confront
Thanks for coming to my TEDtalk.

More from Society

A long thread on how an obsessive & violent antisemite & Holocaust denier has been embraced by the international “community of the good.”

Sarah Wilkinson has a history of Holocaust denial & anti-Jewish hatred dating back (in documented examples) to around 2015.


She is a self-proclaimed British activist for “Palestinian rights” but is more accurately a far Left neo-Nazi. Her son shares the same characteristics of violence, racism & Holocaust denial.

I first documented Sarah Wilkinson’s Holocaust denial back in July 2016. I believe I was the 1st person to do so.

Since then she has produced a long trail of written hate and abuse. See here for a good summary.


Wilkinson has recently been publicly celebrated by @XRebellionUK over her latest violent action against a Jewish owned business. Despite many people calling XR’s attention to her history, XR have chosen to remain in alliance with this neo-Nazi.

Former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell MP is among those who also chose to stand with Wilkinson via a tweet.

But McDonnell is not alone.

Neo-Nazi Sarah Wilkinson is supported and encouraged by thousands of those on the Left who consider themselves “anti-racists”.
The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.