male doesn’t produce eggs, he produces the sperm. He’s still the male. If I impregnated a chick then carried the amniotic sac in a backpack ‘til the baby was done I’ll still be male🤦♂️
I’ll address every nonsense argument and lie used to defend the suicidal gender ideology Thats in vogue today:
3:45 - “So what if you don’t have gametes?”
It’s called a birth defect. You’re still male or female.
*one horrible doctor does a horrible thing* "oh I guess gender is horrible" miss me with that transphobic nonsense
— Goob \u26a1 (@Goob999) February 17, 2021
Here's a video to even disprove your take on sex (not gender) and the binary:https://t.co/bpmqqJWoJX
male doesn’t produce eggs, he produces the sperm. He’s still the male. If I impregnated a chick then carried the amniotic sac in a backpack ‘til the baby was done I’ll still be male🤦♂️
No. They’re still producing sperm. They’re males. This is idiotic. Is this whole video like this? (Probably. 99% likely. Abandon hope.)
No. Some animals being hermaphrodites, which is meaningless w/o the existence of binary sex to contrast it to, still doesn’t make gender ideology or transgenderism valid.
Intersex ≠ transgenderism 🙄
Ova-testes in humans are also a disorder, usually found in those w/ the karyotype disorders that you ppl also try to appropriate (extra X’s/Y’s).
The rest of the vid, I guarantee, will go on trying to conflate these things.
Birth defects, which leave you infertile and often require the removal of cancer-prone defective gonads, are not a new sex and have nothing to do with gender theory or transgenderism.
Having a birth defect that causes your body to not react to testosterone so ur male genitals don’t develop & u look like a prepubescent girl for the rest of your life is not a new sex nor transgenderism.
…Duh! Yet none of this has anything to do w/ mental disorders making you want to be a different sex or no sex.
Yes, very informative Mr. Biology Man. Will you ever get to the part where biology justifies any of the claims made by gender ideology?
Birth defects are definitely variations, moron. If you “biological variation” literally makes it so that you cannot pass on your genes via reproduction, it’s a dysfunction. Sorry.

*phew*! Thank G—wait!
Actually, if you’ve gone through puberty the same as 99.9% of the population and are fertile I think you can safely call yourself male or female.
Bullshit. Extra Y & extra X types, though very rare, have been seen enough for categorization, & they never look quite right.
Not in a “that boy is funny looking” kinda way, but in a “is that a boy or a girl? Literally no one can determine, even their genitals are off” kinda way.
More Bullshit!

“Hey, a female mechanic! That’s a gender! A male in a dress? A new gender!”
Worse is using animals with reproductive biology so far removed from us in every way to try to justify simple mental illness.
…Yea. No.
Hormones in the womb are a hell of a drug, but when gender confusion in children is cured at a rate of 80% when puberty is allowed to happen, it doesn’t support your theories.
Aren’t the gender dysphoric suicidal enough already w/ the promotion of enabling the sickness instead of finding solutions?
Again. Nonsense. This is equivalent to arguing about the number of angels that could fit on the point of a pin.
Yes. Lying is easy. The truth is tough, can be ugly. But this why you gender ideologues will always fail. You will never convince many that your worldview is the truth when it’s obvious you HATE truth.
...uhhh, actually, we’re not the ones throwing dresses & makeup on boys just because they’re sissies & don’t act typical. That’s YOU. It’s the basis of your entire argument!
...unless...It’s caused by the mix of mental and developmental disorders found in the gender dysphoric? Hm, yes? Maybe? Possibly?🤔 https://t.co/VryEL7gSFL
It doesn’t work
Mr. Scientist can’t figure this one out but he expects you to trust in the rest of the bullshit he’s spouting.
Get the fuck out!
More from Society
My first observations in the main thread are here, but this offshoot is needed because there's been so many wise & witty things I've
37.90/ Limbaugh was a cruel hate-machine who made a fortune off hurting people. To say "don't speak ill of the dead" is the attitude of abuse enablers.
— Joshua Cypess (@JoshuaCypess) February 18, 2021
If you can't condemn a ghoul who dedicated his life to destroying society, you're part of the problem! https://t.co/ijvG2zDACH
2/ First, re: those who in their wayward moral obtuseness feel we "can't speak ill of the dead." I've said that this is what abuse enablers say, but I hear that some religious traditions preach this. Oy.
So there's this: https://t.co/7Ky4RA3nkZ &
This is how Rush's death should be honored. Let's not speak ill of the dead, let's quote Rush speaking ill of the dead.
— Sane English (@SaneEnglish) February 17, 2021
3/ Drucker is another great wit, and this carries the proper mood
It's easy to make fun of Rush Limbaugh right now, but it's important to remember that he also brought a lot of people a lot of joy by dying
— Mike Drucker (@MikeDrucker) February 17, 2021
4/ There's definitely a Jewish Tradition angle for how to treat evil people who die: the only respect is to justice, right & wrong, and above all compassion's existence necessitates condemning cruelty
It\u2019s ok\u2014essential, even\u2014to speak the truth about people who caused great harm.
— Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg (@TheRaDR) February 17, 2021
Even after their death.
5/ We're coming up on #Purim, and that's all about how to remember evil. There may be a reason, then, that I share the attitude of many other people committed to righting
today i said Jewish culture requires dancing on the graves of those who have wronged us and i picked up like 300 followers LMAO
— Erin Biba (@erinbiba) February 18, 2021
people love Jewish vengeance \U0001f923\U0001f923
wait till they hear about Purim