1) FALL OF THE CABAL - THE UGLY TRUTHS

10 part documentary (25 tweets)

A documentary expose̒ of the ugly truths about our world and the people who run it. The narrator includes a lot of information in 10 relatively short episodes. Mind-blowing information ! Award winning

2) researcher from the Netherlands, Janet Ossebaard, posted a carefully constructed and painstakingly created docuseries titled, “Fall of the Cabal” 

Fall of the Cabal speaks about false-flags with an objective perspective of time and alternative revelations, goes into human
3) trafficking, pedophilia, media manipulation, ritual sacrifices, and finishes by offering a positive perspective of what’s being done as many awakened would attest to... It goes into detail regarding real events and provides clear examples with a very compassionate purpose of
4) exposing some of the horrific crimes of the cabal... Her effort contains thousands of hours of research and Ossebaard herself asks that you do your own research and double-check everything she presents. 

FALL OF THE CABAL Part 1 of 10 – The End of the World as We Know It
5) The narrator opens with inconvenient truths about the recent wildfires in California, mercury in vaccines, chemtrails, organ harvesting, reptilian and satanic symbols in Vatican buildings, 911, false flag victims and subliminal messages in children’s entertainment. If that

More from Society

Two things can be true at once:
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause


I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.

I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views

I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.

I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.

You May Also Like