Who are the Endocrine Society who are applying with Gendered Intelligence, Stonewall & Brook to intervene in the Tavistock v Bell case?

One weird coincidence is that they share a building with my ex-employer CGD on L St in Washington DC...

It is just a weird coincidence. But these streets around K
St are lobbyist-central around the Capitol.

Organisations who pay for this real estate do it to be close to decision making of US government. Thats their focus

(* or the World Bank/IMF for international development).
The Endocrine Society is a "global community" but it is very US focused in its membership, meetings and advocacy

https://t.co/4y7Utw3Zhn
https://t.co/hJk4MEgKMi
Their position on transgender health has a particular focus on making sure US insurance companies will pay out for it

https://t.co/R8TOlUJ0iL
This is what the ES they say about themselves in the application to intervene

They say its endocrinologists who are responsible for deciding if patients should be prescribed PBs, and assuring their informed consent.

Is that really the case in the UK?
The ES are keen on saying gender dysphoria is not a mental health disorder ....

they talk about brain scans and a lot about intersex conditions
Here is who wrote their position statement.... its US doctors.

Their clinical guideline is a mix of doctors and researchers in the US and the Netherlands ... cheerleaders for child transitioning
This is what Dr Michael Laidlaw says about their guideline

https://t.co/bwbTyxOXbs
There is a UK Society for Endocrinology - its not them that is intervening here.

https://t.co/071HkEbXiS
Does the Endocrine Society, based in Washington DC really represent the voices of UK doctors involved in assessing children w gender dysphoria?

Is the Good Law Project's fighting fund and intervention driven by the involvement of powerful US interests?

https://t.co/CF4ALklJsj

More from Society

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.