The only way you can capture this whole move is by following the price where it goes, trailing your SL. Any attempt to prempt, and you would be out
SAR trades can capture the whole move.
More from Harsh / 허쉬
#Bharti : Keeping above 640 now, impulse counts should play out for 2840 minimum. (Remember its a monthly chart)
Below 640, counts need to be revalidated. https://t.co/1e7hs0ZkxR
Below 640, counts need to be revalidated. https://t.co/1e7hs0ZkxR
#BhartiAirtel #Bharti #Nifty - Chart update - Count wise we are in 5th wave starting from 254.15.
— Harsh / \ud5c8\uc26c (@_Harsh_Mehta_) May 17, 2021
Breakout from consolidation in 4th wave has come after 13 years, so expect solid move in next 3-5 years. Hold the stock and add on declines. pic.twitter.com/lC3Zsfd8vd
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.