BC SCREENERS
Saved by @SAnngeri

A simple Trading system with 2 #movingaverages 13 & 21Sma

What signal it gave today ?

"Sell triggered @ 17365 When 1st 15 min. candle
closed below 13 & 21Sma"

And, then #Nifty fell to 17267, almost 💯points
"Part Book"

More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)

Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@JustNifty
A morning star was spotted in one of the highly traded #Nifty50 stock in week t/f.
SCREENERS
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@JustNifty
@ap_pune had given a list of high liquid stocks for options trading & #auropharma was the 1st one.
Remembered it & made entry @ open for the "High rewarding 3rd wave"

Much appreciation🙏 to @ap_pune for his regular sharing of vital info. & wisdom from years of experience.
ALL
Advertisement
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@JustNifty
@MaverickAmit01
His simple mechanical system of MACD multi t/f with 4 Hour setting seems to remove whipsaws & is producing amazing result with #Nifty

Experience speaks - you listen and adopt

Develop patience to wait for such good set up. Now trail your SL once price has gains https://t.co/jC8tcrZ0Cv
MACD
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@JustNifty
A simple trading system with 2 #movingaverages (13&21)
Prices are far away from MA presently.
"BUY" on "Mean reversion" to MA.

How many are following this method ?
What has been your experience ?
Share them after Mkt Hours, please🙂🙏


A simple trading system with 2 #movingaverages (13&21)
Prices are far away from MA presently.
"BUY" on "Mean reversion" to MA.

13 & 21 were @ 17206 & 17114
& now
13 & 21 are @ 17274 & 17182

Prices too coming down & MA coming up to meet
to generate a signal !!


13 & 21 were @ open 17206 & 17114
& now
13 & 21 are @ 17292 & 17200

Prices & MA are poised to meet
to generate a "BUY" signal !

SL for Longs remain @ 17240 (Fm "VF table")


Remember, every 15 minutes, the #movingaverages are moving up..

A simple trading system with 2 #movingaverages (13&21)
Prices are far away from MA presently.
"BUY" on "Mean reversion" to MA.

21 Sma @ 17255
Buy closer to it (17255-260)with small SL 17240.
SCREENERS
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@JustNifty
If you're interested in learning #priceaction , this is your 1st step - Read this book.
SCREENERS

More from Screeners

Professor
Professor
@DillikiBiili
Some ofthe biggest breakouts occur after Volatility Contraction, the analogy is that more a spring is pressed, higher it jumps whenever it gets released.

There is a VCP Scanner on chartink (Not mine). This may also be used to find potential Breakouts.
SCREENERS , TA SCREENERS
Ripster
Ripster
@ripster47
#tradingtips
#EndofDayScans #free scans

Bullish Scan for 2nd Day Continuation
https://t.co/NywR2hxKhM

Bearish Scan for 2nd Day Continuation
https://t.co/AfNLATYnGm

Save them, Can find good plays using them for next day
I gave many winners here using same 🙏
SCREENERS
Advertisement
Vikrant
Vikrant
@Trading0secrets
Full technical analysis courses in one thread 🧵

For free which is Worth ₹80k 👇

⏭️How elliott wave work with examples

⏭️ Advance price action analysis

⏭️ Richard wyckoff theory

⏭️dow theory (my first video)

If you wanna learn how market behave in long term & short term

You must watch full video 🎥
SCREENERS , ALL , TECHNICALANALYSIS
Sandeep Kulkarni
Sandeep Kulkarni
@moneyworks4u_fa
History tells us when #USDINR moves it moves a lot. In that context it has been remarkably resilient with just 8% depreciation. It looks like we are very close to the point from where Rupee will start to appreciating again.

BTW Nifty Metal has inverse correlation with USDINR. https://t.co/X6cqVcYF3V
SCREENERS
Nithin Kamath
Nithin Kamath
@Nithin0dha
I have spent the last couple of years thinking quite a bit about health. Experimenting with myself and our team, and supporting startups that are trying to help Indians make healthier choices.

A few thoughts on how and why you should focus on your health. 1/9

In chasing money goals, it is easy to forget that all the money in the world can’t buy good health. As we grow older, our health determines the quality of life, not money.
Good health also means the ability to bounce back faster if unforeseen incidents occur. 2/9

Health goals should be about how you feel, not how you look. Wanting to look a certain way, influenced by celebs and influencers who fake it with lights and photography, use performance-enhancing drugs, or hit the genetic lottery, is a recipe for unhappiness. 3/9

Sitting is the new smoking. Setting simple activity goals in terms of how much I move (calories burnt) and reminders to stand up every 45 mins has had the most impact on me. The current health challenge in Zerodha is to set a daily activity goal & try reaching 90% of the time 4/9

Sleeping by 9 pm & getting a workout at 5 am has been helpful. Sleeping early reduces the chances of bingeing when we are drained and have low self-control at the end of the day. A workout in the morning also increases the odds of making healthier choices throughout the day. 5/9
ALL , SCREENERS

You May Also Like

Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie
@patio11
Some people really benefit from hearing advice that everyone knows, for the same reason we keep schools open despite every subject in them having been taught before.

In that spirit, here's some quick Things Many People Find Too Obvious To Have Told You Already.

Your idea is not valuable, at all. All value is in the execution. You think you are an exception; you are not. You should not insist on an NDA to talk about it; nobody serious will engage in contract review over an idea, and this will mark you as clueless.

Technologists tend to severely underestimate the difficulty and expense of creating software, especially at companies which do not have fully staffed industry leading engineering teams ("because software is so easy there, amirite guys?")

Charge more. Charge more still. Go on.

The press is a lossy and biased compression of events in the actual world, and is singularly consumed with its own rituals, status games, and incentives. The news necessarily fails to capture almost everything which happened yesterday. What it says is important usually isn't.

Companies find it incredibly hard to reliably staff positions with hard-working generalists who operate autonomously and have high risk tolerances. This is not the modal employee, including at places which are justifiably proud of the skill/diligence/etc of their employees.
TECH
Simon DeDeo
Simon DeDeo
@SimonDeDeo
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
ALL
Advertisement
Noah Smith
Noah Smith
@Noahpinion
1/OK, data mystery time.

This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE

That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.

Let's check this number.

2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".

The report is available here:

3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.

The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.


4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.

Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A

It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.

That estimate is from 2012.

5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.

I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
SOCIETY
David Rothkopf
David Rothkopf
@djrothkopf
If there is one thing I have learned it is that people love bullshit. They buy bullshit stories from professional bullshit artists, accept bullshit philosophies, purchase bullshit how-to-books, vote for bullshitting politicians.

At first, I resisted believing this because it is illogical and dumb and frankly, doesn't reflect well on the human race of which I am a member (and thus have long been hopeful that it is more of a distinction than it actually turns out to be.)

But if you actually are interested in facts you begin to notice how little most people care for them. Sometimes it is because they are heard to learn and bullshit is so much more widely and easily available. Sometimes it is because facts make them uncomfortable about themselves.

Sometimes it is because just one tiny fact will upset a whole worldview that has grown as comfortable as an overstuffed chair. (Settling into such worldviews is a lot like settling into chairs like that because the longer you're there and the deeper you sink...

...the harder it is to hoist yourself up and out of your fat-assed intellectual laziness.) But I actually think the reason people have such an appetite for bullshit goes deeper, goes to an aspect of ourselves we just can't accept.
LIFE
Michael King \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8
Michael King 🇺🇸...
@8MichaelKing
Ever notice how the top niches are centered around health, wealth, and relationships?

There's a deep-rooted psychological (and biological) reason why.

And today, I'm gonna to explain all of it so you can start profiting off of this knowledge 💰💰

*Now, this thread is going to be long and in depth. Make sure to favorite the top tweet now so you can come back to it later.

So. Down to the very core of every living being (humans, dolphins, bacteria, aliens), there are only two drivers:
1. To survive
2. To reproduce

Right off the bat, we know that sex is a primary driver to human behavior.

This would also mean that each gender has its own insecurities regarding sex.

Men have a subconscious fear that their woman will leave them for someone more successful

Women have a fear that their man will leave them for someone younger & better-looking

We can conclude that men are attracted to looks, and women are attracted to status.

This is human nature down to its very core.

Crazy, blue-haired feminists will try to argue and say otherwise.

But, 50 years of feminism DOES NOT OVERRIDE millions of years of evolutionary biology.

Here's a quick visualization exercise so you can see how true all this is...
STARTUPS