#hdfc F
- Friday was ATH Close
- For 3 weeks, it consolidated above P/SVWAPs
- 3000 CE had covered 10% OI, but still has huge OI

> I shall look for Longs 'if'
- scrip breaches 3k and
- 3k CE writers start covering (Better if 3k PE writers add too)

#trading

More from Pankaj DP

More from Screeners

Central Pivot Range—(CPR)

What does it mean?

7 tweets that will teach you about its basics (and much more):🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

1/ What is CPR?

The basics of CPR, how it's calculated, and TC and BC in CPR.

User: @ZerodhaVarsity.

One can also gauge the trend whether bullish or bearish.

Explained in very simple words

@ZerodhaVarsity 2/ What are the Uses of CPR?

User: @YMehta_

A thread that provides examples along with the concept.

Also includes an Intraday Trading Setup on 5 min


@ZerodhaVarsity @YMehta_ 3/ How to analyze trends with CPR?

User: @cprbykgs

How to interpret CPR based on the candles forming either above or below the daily and weekly CPR.

He is the most famous guy when it comes to CPR, so go through his Twitter and Youtube


@ZerodhaVarsity @YMehta_ @cprbykgs 4/ Interpreting longer timeframes with CPR

User: @cprbykgs

Trend Reversals with CPR when the trend is bullish and it enters the daily CPR

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?