Super list! In case you want to generate and monitor this on demand you can check out the raw material page of Tijori
Chemicals and metals, along with price changes and their producers/consumers in one place and updated everyday
Link: https://t.co/ZzPCPW5ODM https://t.co/4jQ0waGAC9

More from Screeners
#FREETIPS
For new followers ...
If u r a pivot based intraday trader, u should have this cheat sheet. Follow this and C. Your wrong trades will reduce considerably. Good luck.
For new followers ...
If u r a pivot based intraday trader, u should have this cheat sheet. Follow this and C. Your wrong trades will reduce considerably. Good luck.
#FREETIPS
— ScorpioManoj (@scorpiomanojFRM) April 1, 2022
Pivot Rules snapshot
A free one page cheat sheet for pivot based trading that could probably be sold for a hefty price ....
Rem: This is just a broad set of rules. There are many advance rules more than this. pic.twitter.com/FnzmGGKx0P
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?