Folks asked about my reverse outline process so here's a thread..
Simple concept, go through each substantive chapter & log the topic of each paragraph in one line. I do this by hand on a legal pad, so the description has to be super brief. 1/
#SocAF #PhDChat #AcademicChatter

As I go, I write out the subheadings within the chapter with the title & a brief description of the content there (few words). I also note how many paragraphs of "set-up" are at the start of each chapter. 2/
For each paragraph, if it contains empirical data, I make a note of the case/example/quote..still only on a single line. This is indented under the paragraph topic line. For these lines, I wrote 'data' in the margin to flag where empirical data were included. 3/
I use post-it strips to flag things that I think of as I go...cite X or include Y example here or this needs to be fleshed out. 4/
Initially, this outline allows me to see where I'm light on data, when the set-up of sections isn't parallel (e.g. 3 paragraphs for one chapter and 5 for another), where I can include better examples, where my paragraphs are redundant or don't flow well one to the next. 5/
Now that this is done, I will cut the one line descriptions individually & do some visual mapping on a dry erase board, literally moving paragraphs or examples around, inserting new examples, or flagging where a new paragraph would go with a highlighted strip. 6/
I made two copies of the complete outline, so that I can use the original in that form, have one to cut, and one to copy again if needed/to cut paragraph strips from if they get loss/damaged. 7/
I learned the cutting & moving tip from my dissertation chair and am excited to use it for my book manuscript, as he's used it for his books. 8/
But the reverse outlining thing is also useful for article manuscripts. It allows you to much more easily see the whole paper - where reorganization is necessary, if the argument flows, what's redundant. 9/
Here's what the outline looks like. This is one subsection from one chapter. 10/
Here's the cutting part (excuse the sewing cutting board, my dry erase board is on the way). I move as necessary...reordering, moving to a new subsection or chapter, adding "strips" or deleting them entirely. I'll cut the data strips away from the topic strips if needed. 11/
I have a bunch of teeny magnets to hold the strips on the board. Then the moving begins. I'll use post-its or write directly on the board things that need to be addressed. 12/
I'll start doing one chapter at a time and then will zoom out to a couple at once, then finally having all 5 up there. I'll do the intro and conclusion once the substantive chapters are super tight. 13/
I highly recommend doing this by hand..I've tried on the computer, and not the same result. Only having one line really makes you parse down what the paragraph is about. If you can't do it in one line, there might be too much going on in the paragraph. 14/
It also allows you to handle the text which I think there is something to be said for...it's why I do my qualitative coding by hand. Maybe it's "not real," but it makes a difference for at least some folks. 15/
Try to do the entire outline in one sitting/day/as close together as possible. Seeing the entire thing at a single time makes a difference. Things jumped out at me that I'd just read 2 chapters ago. It's easier to see connections/redundancies. 16/
Color coding is useful also..once I start the next phase, I'm going to highlight different types of data/quotes from particular individuals in different colors. I'll easily see if there's too much from one person, or not enough examples from x type of hearing. 17/
Hope this is useful! Happy writing! 18/18

More from Science

So it turns out that an organization I thought was doing good work, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (associated with Center for Inquiry, James Randi, and Martin Gardner) was actually caping for pedophiles. Uhhhh oops?


Since this, bizarrely, turned out to be one of my longest videos ever (??) here's a quick thread to sum it up for those of you like myself with short attention spans. 1/10

In the '90s the False Memory Syndrome Foundation was founded to call attention to the problem of adults suddenly "remembering" child abuse that never actually happened, often under hypnosis. Skeptics like James Randi & Martin Gardner joined their board. 2/10

A new article reveals that the FMSF was founded by parents who had been credibly and PRIVATELY accused of molestation by their now-adult daughter. They publicized the accusation, destroyed the daughter's reputation, and started the foundation. 3/10

The FMSF assumed any accused pedo who joined was innocent, saying "We are a good-looking bunch of people, graying hair, well dressed, healthy, smiling; just about every person who has attended is someone you would surely find interesting and want to count as a friend" 😬 4/10

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.