When SBI starts outshining #banknifty, pay attention. Ratio of SBI vs BankNifty shows a multi-month base break, further outperformance is expected from #SBIN #nifty50 Ratio is sustaining abve 2-yr mean since Feb 2021. Such strength has not been at display since 2015
More from Sbin
A thread on OI and Options charts for SBI - why it stopped rising at 420 and how one could have identified that.
Why I am talking abt SBI so much?
After the results, almost every brokerage came out with upgrades giving trgts of 500-600-700 on SBI, and it is easy for retail to buy CEs immdly; It might rise later, but the pause in the last 2 days ensured that the CEs fall sharply
For those who missed ithttps://t.co/gb1PpJKQdY
— AP (@ap_pune) May 25, 2021
Why I am talking abt SBI so much?
After the results, almost every brokerage came out with upgrades giving trgts of 500-600-700 on SBI, and it is easy for retail to buy CEs immdly; It might rise later, but the pause in the last 2 days ensured that the CEs fall sharply
@rohanshah619 Looks excellent. Reversal from primary trendline as well
#FnOstock #SBIN has completed a 9 month time correction towards the primary trend line & is all set to head higher from here.
— Trendline Investor (@dmdsplyinvestor) July 11, 2022
This could also be a #SIP stock considering it broke out from a decade long consolidation in Feb'21.
Might continue to outperform #Nifty & #Banknifty pic.twitter.com/mYk4exvOn7
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
