The Role of Adoption of Un-Islamic Thoughts, Concepts and Philosophies in the Destruction of The Khilafah - A Thread 🧵

#ReturnTheKhilafah
#YenidenHilafet
#خلافت_کو_قائم_کرو
#أقيموا_الخلافة

One of the important reasons for the abolishment of Khilafah was the adoption of thoughts which are not based on Islamic ideology. This weakness had been creeping in since a few decades after the end of the golden era of Khilafat e rashidoon.
When Khilafah annexed intellectually developed nations like Persia, Romans and Indians through successful implemention of Khilafah's foreign policy of dawah and jihad, they get accustomed with their philosophies. Some Muslims got so impressed with a few of their concepts-
-that they decided to align them with Islam.
So Persian concept of hereditary monarchy, Greek inspired concept of mu'tazila and Hindu concept of body and spirit were practically adopted. As a result, the belief in Islamic thoughts had weakened, and the prophetic method of-
understanding the reality and applying ijtehaad erased from the minds. This progressively dragged Ummah into intellectual decline and worsened the situation. It got to the point that French penal code was adopted in the last years of the Khilafah.
As a result, the obligation to extract solution of each and every human problem from Quran and Sunnah was forgotten. The modernists who presented themselves as scholars added fuel to the fire. They got so much impressed from material growth of the West that they started-
justifying their concepts like democracy, freedoms, feminism, evolution and realism from Islam, and declared Islamic concepts like offensive jihad, Khilafah and Islamic penal code as outdated and impractical for today's reality.
So the Ummah lost it's faith in it's ideology and Islamic sources of jurisprudence and fell prey to mental slavery. The colonialists took full advantage of intellectually fragile state of the Ummah and stripped it's shield (Khilafah) off.
Allah SWT says in the glorious Quran: "Indeed the religion in the sight of Allah is Islam"
So any thought or concept that is not extracted from the sources (Quran and Sunnah) is False, and is the source of destruction for the Ummah. Now, when the current colonialist-
democratic system based on kufr is exposed in the eyes of the Ummah, it is of utmost importance to realize that the only way to revive is by only adopting the thoughts and concepts extracted from the sources of Islam. Only this way the Ummah can earn the right to lead the world.
Follow us on all platforms.

Facebook: https://t.co/S6zpVXPAgr

Instagram: https://t.co/0A10ivH3VI

More from Religion

Assalam Alaiki dear Sister in Islam. I hope this meets you well. Hope you are keeping safe in this pandemic. May Allah preserve you and your beloved family. I would like to address the misconception and misinterpretation in your thread. Please peruse the THREAD below.


1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!

2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”

3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).


4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!
I had written this thread in refutation to your false claims which you had made from your previous account and you had even quoted it from your old account and now you are lying that you didn't know about this thread?
Are you trying to say the Verse of Quran i had mentioned


in the thread is false? If that's your claim then say it clearly that all the verses of Quran and hadiths are false which talks about equality and your propaganda is the ultimate truth and hidden secret of Islam.
a) If you are trying to say that just being born in a Quraysh tribe

makes one superior than others then let me remind you that the first oppressors of the Prophet pbuh were Quraysh, the first battle of Muslims happened with Quraysh, the guy who was cursed by Allah in Quran was a Quraysh (ever read Quran?). And if you want to show that being from

the lineage of Prophets makes you superior than others then let me remind you that the son of Prophet Adam will be in hell (as informed to us by the narrations), the son of Prophet Noah will be in hell, the wife of Prophet Noah will be in hell, the wife of Prophet Lut will be in

hell. And if you are trying to say that only Quraysh had the right to rule and not others then let me remind you from history that the Messenger of Allah pbuh appointed leaders Abdullah bin Ruwaha, Zaid bin Haritha, and Usama bin Zaid, and all of them were not from Quraish.
"Hinduism was one of the world's most easy-going faith traditions, famed for it's non-persecutory history."

I can assure you, it is NOT.

It is neither easy-going, nor non-persecutory. In fact it is the very opposite.

Thread.


Modern Hinduism is a British colonial concept, created in concert with Brahmins, who are at the "apex" of the caste system. The word "Hindoo" in fact, is of Persian origin, meaning a person who lives in the Indus valley.

Colonialists who attempted to study Indian religion in the 18th century (NOT, at the time, Hinduism) were baffled by it. Strata of people living distinctly (the caste system) with overlapping gods didn't fit into their Judeo-Christian understanding of religion.

Which has an ecclesiastical authority, a holy book etc., which Indian religions lacked. In studying "The Hindoo", colonialists prioritized textual sources of knowledge, which is where Brahmins, the priestly caste with a monopoly over education/text come in.

Brahminism was a distinct "religion" (although i don't really want to use the term in this way) that was frankly terrorized of other castes. In fact, the very basis of Brahminism is oppression. Brahmins had scholars who recorded *Brahminical* canon textually.

You May Also Like