#RADICO-1214.80
#Fibonacci extension..
6.857%(1214.60) Done.
further Fibonacci extension on sustain rise above 1215
11.077(1931)
#Probability
More from Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) मैंSchedule Tribes)
#ASIANPAINT-2853
What a beautiful picture
#Wow
एक कलर #लाल भी है
#ASIANPAINT-2931
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) March 3, 2022
Trend down.
Weekly chart. Fibonacci retracement level shown in chart.
Near term 0.236% and 0.382% Fibonacci retracement level likely to be tested.#Perspective pic.twitter.com/cWJ0qaqDhK
What a beautiful picture
#Wow
एक कलर #लाल भी है
More from Radico
#RADICO-1161
6.857%(1214)
whenever above this level further chart update with Fibonacci extension.
#Probability
6.857%(1214)
whenever above this level further chart update with Fibonacci extension.
#Probability
#RADICO -742.30
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribes) (@idineshptl) June 7, 2021
Best thing happened on chart is
High 2007(219.50)
Low 2020(220)
0.50 paise differance. And now at 742..abf going on.. #Wave principle pic.twitter.com/zV8WA9WfGK
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.