Categories Politics
1/ How funding from powerful Religious Right org (with ties to the Trump admin) Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) has gagged radical feminist orgn Women's Liberation Front (WoLF).
— Feminists Open Your Eyes (@LeftwingGc) October 9, 2020
About ADF: https://t.co/Js8RobOOau
& https://t.co/tYj8ilxbpZ
About WoLF: https://t.co/Sdeg0dfZYH
(2/6) I'm a lifelong liberal Democrat. I want to believe those who say that American feminists don't need alliances with the right, but the evidence so far doesn't support it.
We are losing on every front. Every court case that transactivists bring takes another chunk outâĄď¸
(3/6) of women's sex-based protections & girls' futures.
With the ACLU on their side and the Democrats having gone so far left that they've traveled up the other side of the ideological horseshoe w/o realizing it, we're as outgunned as a kid waving a water pistol at a tank.âĄď¸
(4/6) If there's a plan to get back what we've lost and reverse the tide while holding fast to our leftwing status, I want to hear it. But I haven't.
And what I do hear sounds awfully familiar: I've seen most of it over the last couple of years from certain British academicâĄď¸
(5/6) feminists - women who have, not entirely without cause, been accused of snobbery and purity politics by many of the people who worked to bring about the recent string of UK successes against gender extremism.
Radical feminists in the US are a scattered group, dwindlingâĄď¸
As long as that is true, it's fine.
Cuomo's standard was neither consistent nor scientific. That is a clear first amendment violation.
Conservatives are crowing over this as an own the libs moment, denying that many who support public health restrictions are people of faith. This broke long standing precedent, so don't at me with your calls for originalism etc. This is just know-nothing politics by other means. https://t.co/KLeiKlp6p7
— Gregg Gonsalves (@gregggonsalves) November 26, 2020
Gorsuch is SCIENTIFICALLY RIGHT HERE.
If people can't admit that, then they are allowing their biases to
Neil Gorsuch goes off on @NYGovCuomo in the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling blocking his Covid restrictions for religious services. https://t.co/HOKmgsUAKg pic.twitter.com/dcl7o5irDd
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) November 26, 2020
This on the other hand is 100% BS.
Not a single scientist I know supports this double standard. The best ones know that the type ofvenue is irrelevant... Only the size and # of people
Sonia Sotomayor dissents: \u201cJustices of this Court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials about the environments in which a contagious virus, now infecting a million Americans each week, spreads most easily.\u201d https://t.co/HOKmgtcc8Q
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) November 26, 2020
In short, it is the LEFT here using religious bias to promote an antiscientific standard and allowing the State to violate Rights.
The Liberals and CJJR should be ashamed.
Another good thread here.
A consistent standard would have passed constitutional muster.
Last night, SCOTUS issued injunctive relief to houses of worship challenging NYC\u2019s COVID-19 restrictions, the first time it has granted such relief during the pandemic. I have mixed views about the decision and early reactions to it.
— John Inazu (@JohnInazu) November 26, 2020