Beyond disappointment in @johnfocook and his @skepticscience. It has become another scientology church.

Maybe @ggreenwald will want to make a paper on this:

> **How the imperialist mindset/narrative is infesting the scientific fields.**

//next

What @skepticscience posted on their FB page
> https://t.co/NXMG74TVhm

My instantaneously censored comment + blocking me for being able to comment on their page.
> //next tweet
"You mean the team of Biden ?
The oligarch team who's as dirty as Trump's team ?
The same Biden who has relentlessly hunted Snowden under Obama and forced both Snowden and Greenwald into exile?
Sure!
//next
I used to appreciate reading "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists" and "Skeptical Science". Now you both are deep in political platitudes.
Your rationals are completely outdated.
//next
You should educate yourself and guess better on the future of climate under neoliberalism (be it nationalist or globalist) IF the issue really concerns you.
https://t.co/BZEbI94DbU
//next
For people who still want to educate themselves instead of wasting their time reading rants, just follow @JMJancovici and @DrJamesEHansen. Those are quite apolitical (read "scientific mindset") and still at the top.
https://t.co/wuDfFvD6gn
"
next
This next two points are dedicated to the @johnfocook's "critical thinking" fallacies
(1) https://t.co/8FrfFrqNab in relation to Cook's Cranky Uncle limitations.
//next
Anyone who wants to understand the pros and cons of evidence based science should start w/ Nancy Cartwright , one of the most influential philosopher in this field.
> https://t.co/RhLi8S3Paa
> https://t.co/nNg16SASMD
//next
(2) To reach the deepest depths of the issue concerning **facts** in the so called "evidence base science"
> Mioara Mugur-Schächter is what you seek
https://t.co/et6xLmNO1U

This is the pantheon of scientific thinking
//next
A final advice to @johnfocook @skepticscience :

**If you do not want people to comment at a political level, then do not post at political level.**

Start pouring water into your wine or you will continue to drive people away from your echo chamber.
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Politics

1/ Imagine that as soon as the referendum result the EU announced that it was looking forward to the end of free movement of UK citizens in the EU


2/ Imagine if the EU said finally all those retired Brits in the EU27 could go home

3/ Imagine if the EU said finally all those Brits in the EU could stop driving down wages, taking jobs and stop sending benefits back to the UK

4/ Imagine if the EU said it was looking to use UK citizens as “bargaining chips” to get a better trade deal

5/ Imagine if the EU told UK citizens in the EU27 that they could no longer rely on established legal rights and they would have to apply for a new status which they have to pay for for less rights

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.