1 (Thread) Reminders of what the democrats said before the election to create what is happening today.
Trump is a dictator lol my a$$ 😂
Although we will end up with one
I am a marketer. There's no way I could get international media to pay attention to a small insignificant group of people without an agenda
https://t.co/r9yJbwEdMp
They have been working on this for YEARS https://t.co/mrOlZa8mhx
https://t.co/3rF7NtDAgf
I would like to know where this information comes from.
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) September 4, 2020
From what I have seen @realDonaldTrump if NOTHING else loves the US.
The @TheAtlantic on the other hand used to be a great publication. Now it's a rag (and has been).
Let's find out why https://t.co/oMZZCIKk6d
https://t.co/rN3ghcC0Xi
(THREAD) How about a dive into the Southern Poverty Law Centre? They are always trying to deflect any sort of critical thought about Agenda 21 etc?
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) September 24, 2020
The heart of Conspiracy Theory smears.
What do you say? More tonight! https://t.co/0gedhOEGnT
(Thread) PolitiFact. So let's take a look at this "venerable" fact checking site to see what we can find.
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) September 21, 2020
Because goodness knows we can all use some help sifting through the "Fake News"
So is this the answer we have been looking for... or a crock? pic.twitter.com/dNctIwJZs5
They just believe the rhetoric blindly. This happened from 2016 - 2020
https://t.co/mEmhiyojLn
This is a fact https://t.co/qVVXz2hnfa
1/ For years and years Hollywood stars/politicians have been calling for violence against Trump supporters and Trump himself....that culminated in a summer of arson, looting & brutality.
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) December 25, 2020
Now without proof, the same people insinuate a boom comment connects Giuliani to terrorism? https://t.co/pVdydJaXJ0
....and people choose to ignore this
https://t.co/Id9ae9oqvW
16/ In 2004, David Brock, a democratic party operative, received $2 million to launch Media Matters which is a tax exempt 501(c)(3) organization targeting media "bias".
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) September 17, 2020
The original goal was to act as a \u201cfact-checker\u201d focussing on conservative media programming. pic.twitter.com/ADF5K7Ibwh
https://t.co/ikLihhDWQK
https://t.co/hOoe4oeVL7
The only coup that is happening is by the democrats. But we have seen this throughout
https://t.co/KQwLb5aoBp
https://t.co/jYmiREiIiO
https://t.co/CvDZDwjSM7
https://t.co/vSVIKScl6a
1. It's time to look under all the tech rocks. No better place to start than Zuckerberg
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) December 14, 2020
"the organization has been deemed likely to be "one of the most well-funded philanthropies in human history."https://t.co/gyjnt3g138
17/ In 2018, Sunlight Foundation ran projects focussing the Trump Admin and included a project called \u201cTracking the Trump Administration\u2019s Record on Transparency,\u201d which is now called the Web Integrity Projecthttps://t.co/sBekhcoJlw
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) October 30, 2020
23/ The Democracy Fund also created a voter Study Group, "which surveyed 8,000 American voters on their political and social views."
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) October 30, 2020
As you can see Omidyar is very interested in how the US is run and why people vote the way they do. pic.twitter.com/XH6ddt2wVu
Pierre Omidyar seems to have a vested interest (about voting by mail)
https://t.co/Fo53H3vIJI
27/ The Democracy Fund Voice has lobbied on several bills:
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) October 30, 2020
* Safeguarding Election Infrastructure Act of 2019
* Vote By Mail Act of 2019
* Universal Right to Vote by Mail Act of 2019
* White House Ethics Transparency Act of 2019
* 2020 Judiciary Appropriations Act
hmmmm? pic.twitter.com/Evz9EHNCfc
https://t.co/wKnT5zcoVK
Biden says in his own words that there is Election Fraud!! pic.twitter.com/5T6Fo70yZy
— Dr. Cole (@Cole44749821) January 4, 2021
https://t.co/oDFhv6gWyw
(THREAD) Who is Brian Porter Kemp (Governor of Georgia) https://t.co/pOaOAEU7FF
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) November 29, 2020
It's almost funny if it wasn't so scary
https://t.co/2Mv6TJocY7
(THREAD) The Real Biden through the years. Share this with the dummies cheering him on (sorry guys I am usually nicer but I am tired. https://t.co/mXiSt7Zcti
— \U0001f603 unspinthespin \U0001f603 (@unspinthespin) December 29, 2020
#stopthesteal
https://t.co/ZbLIOjnPqo
More from Politics
You May Also Like
Keep dwelling on this:
Further Examination of the Motif near PRRA Reveals Close Structural Similarity to the SEB Superantigen as well as Sequence Similarities to Neurotoxins and a Viral SAg.
The insertion PRRA together with 7 sequentially preceding residues & succeeding R685 (conserved in β-CoVs) form a motif, Y674QTQTNSPRRAR685, homologous to those of neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) and Bungarus genera, as well as neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
(20) (Fig. 2D). We further noticed that the same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.
https://t.co/EwwJOSa8RK
In (B), the segment S680PPRAR685 including the PRRA insert and highly conserved cleavage site *R685* is shown in van der Waals representation (black labels) and nearby CDR residues of the TCRVβ domain are labeled in blue/white
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Sequence Identity %
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Y674 - QTQTNSPRRA - R685
Similar to neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) & Bungarus genera & neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
T678 - NSPRRA- R685
Superantigenic core, consistently aligned against bacterial or viral SAgs
Further Examination of the Motif near PRRA Reveals Close Structural Similarity to the SEB Superantigen as well as Sequence Similarities to Neurotoxins and a Viral SAg.
The insertion PRRA together with 7 sequentially preceding residues & succeeding R685 (conserved in β-CoVs) form a motif, Y674QTQTNSPRRAR685, homologous to those of neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) and Bungarus genera, as well as neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
(20) (Fig. 2D). We further noticed that the same segment bears close similarity to the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp120 SAg motif F164 to V174.
https://t.co/EwwJOSa8RK
In (B), the segment S680PPRAR685 including the PRRA insert and highly conserved cleavage site *R685* is shown in van der Waals representation (black labels) and nearby CDR residues of the TCRVβ domain are labeled in blue/white
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Sequence Identity %
https://t.co/BsY8BAIzDa
Y674 - QTQTNSPRRA - R685
Similar to neurotoxins from Ophiophagus (cobra) & Bungarus genera & neurotoxin-like regions from three RABV strains
T678 - NSPRRA- R685
Superantigenic core, consistently aligned against bacterial or viral SAgs
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
