Yesterday afternoon Georgia’s Senate panel hosted Rudy Giuliani for an evidential hearing regarding voter fraud in Georgia. The fake news won’t report the facts so it is up to us. Here were my key takeaways from the session.

The biggest piece of evidence was video footage that showed several suitcases being rolled out from under a table after poll watchers and media were told that vote counting was over and asked to leave. Clear evidence of significant fraud.
A Professor of Constitutional Law and member of 11th Circuit and Supreme Court Bar spoke about a lower than normal mail-in rejection rate of 0.33% in this election versus 6.4% in the 2016 election despite having twice the number of mail-in ballots.
Normalizing for this, 40k votes were counted that shouldn’t have been. More critical perhaps, was the view that the consent decree signed by Georgia’s Secretary of State violates the statutory scheme and permits the legislature to invalidate the entire election.
A change to the underage registration window to allow 16 yr olds to register 6 months earlier than normal also violates the constitution and allows the legislature to step in. Some 66k underage votes were counted in this election that shouldn’t have been counted under state law.
Without even proving any fraud, these two items would allow the legislature of Georgia to select electors of their choosing and based on this testimony it is likely that the Supreme Court would agree.
A polling analyst said 40k people in Georgia voted illegally by moving from one county to another more than 30 days prior to the election and voting in their prior county of residence. Those votes were counted even though they violate state law. The data is public information.
He also found that 2,000 voters were registered to the same homeless shelter and said this is an easy loophole to abuse.
Dana Smith, a local Georgian and election volunteer for years, noted that the paper ballots from the Dominion machines at her location fell into containers that didn’t have seals and had no chain of custody forms.
The ballots were transferred to canvas bags and she requested official seals to secure these bags before transferring them to the central office. After several requests, the supervisor finally provided the seals but there was no chain of custody form.
The supervisor refused to provide it. The supervisor drove the ballots to the central office to drop them off and Dana followed them. The next morning, Dana went to central office, told them the story, and requested a chain of custody form for the canvas bags.
She asked to see the bags so that she could verify that the seals were unbroken. All requests were denied. During the first recount, these same ballots were delivered back to Dana’s local location in paper boxes, not in the canvas bags.
Anything could have happened to the ballots between the time that they left her polling location and the recount. One college student at Georgia State, Grace, said that she never registered for an absentee ballot in her life.
When she showed up to vote, she was informed that someone had registered absentee under her identification. She was later told that the person voted the ballot. She submitted a case to the Secretary of State and was given the run around. The case was closed with no investigation.
Grace still isn’t sure if her vote counted.

I found these testimonies to be highly troubling. I found the information provided in these testimonies to be extremely convincing. The people who testified signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury.
These testimonies alone amount to 100,000s of votes that should never have been counted. Many multiples of what Trump would need to win the election. These testimonies also suggest that the legislature can act right now, without any evidence of fraud, because the constitution
allows the legislature to step in when the statutory scheme is changed without a change to state law. Put simply, the Secretary of State cannot change the voting process without first getting approval from the people’s representatives – Georgia voters. #stopthesteal
@threadreaderapp

unroll

More from Politics

So let's see a show of hands: how many of you even knew Huber was digging into the Clinton Foundation? While he was assisting Horowitz in his digging into the FISC/Steele Dossier/Fusion GPS/Perkins Coie/DNC/Hillary campaign stuff?


I'm sure Huber is coming to DC *only* to discuss Clinton Foundation things with Meadows and his committee.

He for certain, like, won't be huddling with Horowitz or that new guy, Whitaker while he's in town. That would NEVER HAPPEN. [wink wink wink!] 😉

I just spent a year and a half telling you they will SHOW YOU what they are REALLY DOING when they are READY.

Not before.

No matter how much whining is done about it.

I'm exhausted but it's worth it.

Now you know why they're f**king TERRIFIED of Whitaker, the closer tapped by Trump to come in late for the hysterical fireworks that will ensue soon.

Look who's suddenly fund raising for his legal defen- er, I mean, ha ha - his reelection campaign!
This is partly what makes it impossible to have a constructive conversation nowadays. The stubborn refusal to accept that opposition to Trumpism and GOP nationalism is about more than simply holding different beliefs about things in and of itself. 👇


It's fine for people to hold different beliefs. But that doesn't mean all beliefs deserve equal treatment or tolerance and it doesn't mean intolerance of some beliefs makes a person intolerant of every belief which they don't share.

So if I said I don't think Trumpism deserves to be tolerated because it's just a fresh 21st century coat of cheap paint on a failed, dangerous 20th century ideology (fascism) that doesn't mean I'm intolerant of all beliefs with which I disagree. You'd think this would be obvious.

Another important facet. People who support fascist movements tend to give what they think are valid reasons for supporting them. That doesn't mean anyone is obliged to tolerate fascism or accept their proffered excuse.


Say you joined a neighborhood group that sets up community gardens and does roadside beautification projects. All good, right? Say one day you're having a meeting and you notice the President and exec board of this group are saying some bizarre things about certain neighbors.

You May Also Like