Yesterday afternoon Georgia’s Senate panel hosted Rudy Giuliani for an evidential hearing regarding voter fraud in Georgia. The fake news won’t report the facts so it is up to us. Here were my key takeaways from the session.

The biggest piece of evidence was video footage that showed several suitcases being rolled out from under a table after poll watchers and media were told that vote counting was over and asked to leave. Clear evidence of significant fraud.
A Professor of Constitutional Law and member of 11th Circuit and Supreme Court Bar spoke about a lower than normal mail-in rejection rate of 0.33% in this election versus 6.4% in the 2016 election despite having twice the number of mail-in ballots.
Normalizing for this, 40k votes were counted that shouldn’t have been. More critical perhaps, was the view that the consent decree signed by Georgia’s Secretary of State violates the statutory scheme and permits the legislature to invalidate the entire election.
A change to the underage registration window to allow 16 yr olds to register 6 months earlier than normal also violates the constitution and allows the legislature to step in. Some 66k underage votes were counted in this election that shouldn’t have been counted under state law.
Without even proving any fraud, these two items would allow the legislature of Georgia to select electors of their choosing and based on this testimony it is likely that the Supreme Court would agree.
A polling analyst said 40k people in Georgia voted illegally by moving from one county to another more than 30 days prior to the election and voting in their prior county of residence. Those votes were counted even though they violate state law. The data is public information.
He also found that 2,000 voters were registered to the same homeless shelter and said this is an easy loophole to abuse.
Dana Smith, a local Georgian and election volunteer for years, noted that the paper ballots from the Dominion machines at her location fell into containers that didn’t have seals and had no chain of custody forms.
The ballots were transferred to canvas bags and she requested official seals to secure these bags before transferring them to the central office. After several requests, the supervisor finally provided the seals but there was no chain of custody form.
The supervisor refused to provide it. The supervisor drove the ballots to the central office to drop them off and Dana followed them. The next morning, Dana went to central office, told them the story, and requested a chain of custody form for the canvas bags.
She asked to see the bags so that she could verify that the seals were unbroken. All requests were denied. During the first recount, these same ballots were delivered back to Dana’s local location in paper boxes, not in the canvas bags.
Anything could have happened to the ballots between the time that they left her polling location and the recount. One college student at Georgia State, Grace, said that she never registered for an absentee ballot in her life.
When she showed up to vote, she was informed that someone had registered absentee under her identification. She was later told that the person voted the ballot. She submitted a case to the Secretary of State and was given the run around. The case was closed with no investigation.
Grace still isn’t sure if her vote counted.

I found these testimonies to be highly troubling. I found the information provided in these testimonies to be extremely convincing. The people who testified signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury.
These testimonies alone amount to 100,000s of votes that should never have been counted. Many multiples of what Trump would need to win the election. These testimonies also suggest that the legislature can act right now, without any evidence of fraud, because the constitution
allows the legislature to step in when the statutory scheme is changed without a change to state law. Put simply, the Secretary of State cannot change the voting process without first getting approval from the people’s representatives – Georgia voters. #stopthesteal
@threadreaderapp

unroll

More from Politics

39.1% of Democrats think that it's wrong to negatively stereotype people based on their place of birth... AND that Southerners are more racist. https://t.co/yp1hviLuBB


65.2% of Republicans think that people shouldn't be so easily offended... AND that Black Lives Matter is offensive.
https://t.co/znmVhqIaL8


64.6% of Democrats think that a woman has the right to do what she wants with her body... AND that selling organs should be illegal.

48.5% of Democrats think that a woman has the right to do what she wants with her body... AND that prostitution should be illegal.


57.9% of Republicans think that people should be free to express their opinions in the workplace... AND that athletes should not be allowed to sit or kneel during the national anthem. https://t.co/ds2ig1NJFr


Democrats: Men and women are equal in their talents and abilities. Also, women are superior. https://t.co/bEFSmqQguo
THREAD:
Good afternoon, followers of frivolous election litigation. There's a last-minute entry in the competition for dumbest pre-inauguration lawsuit - a totally loony effort to apparently leave the entire USA without a government.

We'll start with the complaint in a minute.

But first, I want to give you a quick explanation for why I'm going to keep talking about these cases even after the inauguration.

They're part of an ongoing effort - one that's not well-coordinated but is widespread - to discredit our fundamental system of government.

It's a direct descendent, in more ways than one, of birtherism. And here's the thing about birtherism. It might have been a joke to a lot of people, but it was extremely pernicious. It obviously validated the racist "not good enough to be President" crowd. But that wasn't all.

Don't get me wrong, that was bad enough. Validating racism helped put the kind of shitbird who would tweet this from an official government account into power. But it didn't stop


(Also, if you agree with Pompeo about multiculturalism - the legendary melting pot - not being what this country is all about, you need to stop following me now. And maybe go somewhere and think about your life choices and what made you such a tool.)
Here we go. Tag 4 des Impeachments. Trumps Verteidigung.


Es wird argumentiert, dass Trump nur habe sicherstellen wollen, dass die Wahl fair abgelaufen sei. Die Verteidigung zeigt Clips einzelner Demokraten, die der Zertifizierung von Trumps Stimmen 2016 widersprechen. (Dass es 2016 keinen von Obama gesandten Mob aufs Kapitol gab?Egal!)

Die intellektuelle Unehrlichkeit ist so unfassbar, ich weiß kaum, wo ich hier überhaupt anfangen soll; so viele fucking Strohmänner auf einmal.

Die Verteidigung spielt random Clips, in denen Demokraten “fight” sagen, fast zehn Minuten lang. Weil Trump 20mal am 6. Januar “fight” gesagt hat. Dies ist kein Witz. Komisch, dass sonst die Folge nie war, dass ein Mob das Kapitol gestürmt hat und Pence hängen wollte


“Dieser Fall geht um politischen Hass” Ich mein, ja. “Die House Managers hassen Donald Trump.”

So close.

You May Also Like