More from itrade(DJ)
Yesterday sell 14700 than 14600 than 14800 market come down sell sell 15 k call going up sell 14400 put Getting some profit buy protection 14450 pe 14950 ce now u know ur max loss now wait or do adjustment with sell upar side ce or pe it\u2019s practical knowledge not books knowledge pic.twitter.com/J5sPGClVUZ
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) May 16, 2021
More from Optionslearnings
If we buy hedges, Margin will reduce & ROI increases.
More strategies will be shared going forward.
All u need is execute with Discipline & sticking with system when in DD.
(1/n) https://t.co/3KH9v0tgsb
A simple INTRADAY strategy with decent BACKTEST report of more than 3-5% returns on Monthly basis.
— OptionSeller(Vardhan) (@CaVardhanCa) August 15, 2021
Will be sharing live report on daily basis for a month.
& will conduct FREE webinar to discuss about the results in coming weeks.
Sharing all rules below.
(1/n) https://t.co/VMlxNtX90s pic.twitter.com/cJaa9axRss
to learn more about Algo Trading (in both directional & non directional) , you can visit my Telegram channel especially created for Algo Strategies.
Will be updating Daily Performance of our Algos in below
@SarangSood Sarang bhai according to you what number of vix is ideal for option buyers and what is that for option sellers? And is there any common number which is ideal for both?
— Dhaval bhatt (@Dhavalb55011726) July 14, 2021
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?